dc.contributor.author
Pasternack, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Grieger, Jens
dc.contributor.author
Rust, Henning W.
dc.contributor.author
Ulbrich, Uwe
dc.date.accessioned
2021-08-11T07:11:11Z
dc.date.available
2021-08-11T07:11:11Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/31589
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-31321
dc.description.abstract
Near-term climate predictions such as multi-year to decadal forecasts are increasingly being used to guide adaptation measures and building of resilience. To ensure the utility of multi-member probabilistic predictions, inherent systematic errors of the prediction system must be corrected or at least reduced. In this context, decadal climate predictions have further characteristic features, such as the long-term horizon, the lead-time-dependent systematic errors (drift) and the errors in the representation of long-term changes and variability. These features are compounded by small ensemble sizes to describe forecast uncertainty and a relatively short period for which typical pairs of hindcasts and observations are available to estimate calibration parameters.
With DeFoReSt (Decadal Climate Forecast Recalibration Strategy), Pasternack et al. (2018) proposed a parametric post-processing approach to tackle these problems. The original approach of DeFoReSt assumes third-order polynomials in lead time to capture conditional and unconditional biases, second order for dispersion and first order for start time dependency. In this study, we propose not to restrict orders a priori but use a systematic model selection strategy to obtain model orders from the data based on non-homogeneous boosting.
The introduced boosted recalibration estimates the coefficients of the statistical model, while the most relevant predictors are selected automatically by keeping the coefficients of the less important predictors to zero. Through toy model simulations with differently constructed systematic errors, we show the advantages of boosted recalibration over DeFoReSt. Finally, we apply boosted recalibration and DeFoReSt to decadal surface temperature forecasts from the German initiative Mittelfristige Klimaprognosen (MiKlip) prototype system. We show that boosted recalibration performs equally as well as DeFoReSt and yet offers a greater flexibility.
en
dc.format.extent
21 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
climate predictions
en
dc.subject
Model selection for DeFoReSt
en
dc.subject
toy model experiments
en
dc.subject
climate surface temperature forecasts
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::550 Geowissenschaften, Geologie::551 Geologie, Hydrologie, Meteorologie
dc.title
Recalibrating decadal climate predictions – what is an adequate model for the drift?
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.5194/gmd-14-4335-2021
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue
7
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Geoscientific Model Development
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
7
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Copernicus Publications
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
4335
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
4355
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
14
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4335-2021
refubium.affiliation
Geowissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Meteorologie
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation ist aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
de
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1991-9603