dc.contributor.author
Hallin, Caroline
dc.contributor.author
Hofstede, Jacobus L. A.
dc.contributor.author
Martinez, Grit
dc.contributor.author
Jensen, Jürgen
dc.contributor.author
Baron, Nina
dc.contributor.author
Heimann, Thorsten
dc.contributor.author
Kroon, Aart
dc.contributor.author
Arns, Arne
dc.contributor.author
Almström, Björn
dc.contributor.author
Sørensen, Per
dc.contributor.author
Larson, Magnus
dc.date.accessioned
2021-07-29T13:37:12Z
dc.date.available
2021-07-29T13:37:12Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/31450
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-31183
dc.description.abstract
From November 12th to 13th in 1872, an extreme coastal flood event occurred in the south Baltic Sea. An unusual combination of winds created a storm surge reaching up to 3.5 m above mean sea level, which is more than a meter higher than all other observations over the past 200 years. On the Danish, German, and Swedish coasts, about 300 people lost their lives. The consequences of the storm in Denmark and Germany were more severe than in Sweden, with significantly larger destruction and higher numbers of casualties. In Denmark and Germany, the 1872 storm has been more extensively documented and remembered and still influences local and regional risk awareness. A comparative study indicates that the collective memory of the 1872 storm is related to the background knowledge about floods, the damage extent, and the response to the storm. Flood marks and dikes help to remember the events. In general, coastal flood defence is to the largest degree implemented in the affected areas in Germany, followed by Denmark, and is almost absent in Sweden, corresponding to the extent of the collective memory of the 1872 storm. Within the affected countries, there is local variability of flood risk awareness associated with the collective memory of the storm. Also, the economic dependency on flood-prone areas and conflicting interests with the tourism industry have influence on flood protection decisions. The processes of climate change adaptation and implementation of the EU Floods Directive are slowly removing these differences in flood risk management approaches.
en
dc.format.extent
22 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
collective memory
en
dc.subject
historical storms
en
dc.subject
flood risk management
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::550 Geowissenschaften, Geologie::551 Geologie, Hydrologie, Meteorologie
dc.title
A Comparative Study of the Effects of the 1872 Storm and Coastal Flood Risk Management in Denmark, Germany, and Sweden
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
1697
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/w13121697
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Water
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
12
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
13
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121697
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft / Forschungszentrum für Umweltpolitik (FFU)
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2073-4441