dc.contributor.author
Kostka, Genia
dc.contributor.author
Steinacker, Lea
dc.contributor.author
Meckel, Miriam
dc.date.accessioned
2021-08-02T11:24:11Z
dc.date.available
2021-08-02T11:24:11Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/30470
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-30210
dc.description.abstract
How does the public perceive facial recognition technology and how much do they accept facial recognition technology in different political contexts? Based on online surveys resembling the Internet-connected population in China, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States, our study finds that facial recognition technology enjoys generally highest acceptance among respondents in China, while acceptance is lowest in Germany, and the United Kingdom and the United States are in between. A closer examination through the lens of an integrated technology acceptance model reveals interesting variations in the selected four countries based, among other factors, on socio-demographic factors as well as perceived consequences, usefulness, and reliability of facial recognition technology. While previous research has pointed out that facial recognition technology is an instrument for state surveillance and control, this study shows that surveillance and control are not foremost on the minds of citizens in China, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States, but rather notions of convenience and improved security.
en
dc.format.extent
20 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
facial recognition technology
en
dc.subject
public opinion
en
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.title
Between security and convenience: Facial recognition technology in the eyes of citizens in China, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1177/09636625211001555
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Public Understanding of Science
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
6
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
671
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
690
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
30
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211001555
refubium.affiliation
Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Ostasiatisches Seminar / Institut für Chinastudien
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0963-6625
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1361-6609
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert