dc.contributor.author
Madden, E. H.
dc.contributor.author
Bader, M.
dc.contributor.author
Behrens, J.
dc.contributor.author
Dinther, Y. van
dc.contributor.author
Gabriel, A.-A.
dc.contributor.author
Rannabauer, L.
dc.contributor.author
Ulrich, T.
dc.contributor.author
Uphoff, C.
dc.contributor.author
Vater, Stefan
dc.contributor.author
Zelst, I. van
dc.date.accessioned
2021-04-16T10:11:05Z
dc.date.available
2021-04-16T10:11:05Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/30389
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-30130
dc.description.abstract
How does megathrust earthquake rupture govern tsunami behaviour? Recent modelling advances permit evaluation of the influence of 3-D earthquake dynamics on tsunami genesis, propagation, and coastal inundation. Here, we present and explore a virtual laboratory in which the tsunami source arises from 3-D coseismic seafloor displacements generated by a dynamic earthquake rupture model. This is achieved by linking open-source earthquake and tsunami computational models that follow discontinuous Galerkin schemes and are facilitated by highly optimized parallel algorithms and software. We present three scenarios demonstrating the flexibility and capabilities of linked modelling. In the first two scenarios, we use a dynamic earthquake source including time-dependent spontaneous failure along a 3-D planar fault surrounded by homogeneous rock and depth-dependent, near-lithostatic stresses. We investigate how slip to the trench influences tsunami behaviour by simulating one blind and one surface-breaching rupture. The blind rupture scenario exhibits distinct earthquake characteristics (lower slip, shorter rupture duration, lower stress drop, lower rupture speed), but the tsunami is similar to that from the surface-breaching rupture in run-up and length of impacted coastline. The higher tsunami-generating efficiency of the blind rupture may explain how there are differences in earthquake characteristics between the scenarios, but similarities in tsunami inundation patterns. However, the lower seafloor displacements in the blind rupture result in a smaller displaced volume of water leading to a narrower inundation corridor inland from the coast and a 15 per cent smaller inundation area overall. In the third scenario, the 3-D earthquake model is initialized using a seismo-thermo-mechanical geodynamic model simulating both subduction dynamics and seismic cycles. This ensures that the curved fault geometry, heterogeneous stresses and strength and material structure are consistent with each other and with millions of years of modelled deformation in the subduction channel. These conditions lead to a realistic rupture in terms of velocity and stress drop that is blind, but efficiently generates a tsunami. In all scenarios, comparison with the tsunamis sourced by the time-dependent seafloor displacements, using only the time-independent displacements alters tsunami temporal behaviour, resulting in later tsunami arrival at the coast, but faster coastal inundation. In the scenarios with the surface-breaching and subduction-initialized earthquakes, using the time-independent displacements also overpredicts run-up. In the future, the here presented scenarios may be useful for comparison of alternative dynamic earthquake-tsunami modelling approaches or linking choices, and can be readily developed into more complex applications to study how earthquake source dynamics influence tsunami genesis, propagation and inundation.
en
dc.format.extent
30 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Seismic cycle
en
dc.subject
Numerical modelling
en
dc.subject
Earthquake dynamics
en
dc.subject
Earthquake hazards
en
dc.subject
Subduction zone processes
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::550 Geowissenschaften, Geologie::550 Geowissenschaften
dc.title
Linked 3-D modelling of megathrust earthquake-tsunami events: from subduction to tsunami run up
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1093/gji/ggaa484
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Geophysical Journal International
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
487
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
516
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
224
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa484
refubium.affiliation
Mathematik und Informatik
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Mathematik
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0956-540X
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1365-246X
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert