dc.contributor.author
Lorenz, Timo
dc.contributor.author
Heinitz, Kathrin
dc.contributor.author
Beer, Clemens
dc.contributor.author
Woerkom, Marianne van
dc.date.accessioned
2021-03-12T15:54:04Z
dc.date.available
2021-03-12T15:54:04Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/29925
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-29667
dc.description.abstract
The Strength Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) Questionnaire has been shown to be a reliable instrument for the measurement of its four dimensions perceived organizational support for strengths use, perceived organizational support for deficit correction, strengths use behavior, and deficit correction behavior in the context of organizations. This paper aims to adapt and validate the SUDCO for the German-speaking population (SUDCO-G). Three studies were conducted. Confirmatory factor analyses and correlations with other psychological constructs on the data of three German samples (N-1 = 302; N-2 = 243, N-3 = 295) were performed. The twenty-four item SUDCO-G exhibits the anticipated factorial structure with four factors and an acceptable model fit in all three studies (CFI = .920-.937, TLI = .911-.929, RMSEA = .063-.079, SRMR = 0.52-.075). The associations of the four dimensions to other constructs concur with previous findings (study 2) and the subscales of the SUDCO-G also show positive relations with general strengths use, meaning of work and Psychological Capital (study 3). We conclude that the SUDCO-G is a reliable and valid instrument for the use in the German-speaking population.
en
dc.format.extent
18 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
perceived organizational support
en
dc.subject
cross-cultural adaptation
en
dc.subject
positive psychology
en
dc.subject
method variance
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::150 Psychologie::150 Psychologie
dc.title
Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
e0245127
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pone.0245127
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
PLoS ONE
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
16
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245127
refubium.affiliation
Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie
refubium.affiliation.other
Arbeitsbereich Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1932-6203
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert