dc.contributor.author
Ando, Ayaka
dc.contributor.author
Parzer, Peter
dc.contributor.author
Kaess, Michael
dc.contributor.author
Schell, Susanne
dc.contributor.author
Henze, Romy
dc.contributor.author
Delorme, Stefan
dc.contributor.author
Stieltjes, Bram
dc.contributor.author
Resch, Franz
dc.contributor.author
Brunner, Romuald
dc.contributor.author
Koenig, Julian
dc.date.accessioned
2021-04-08T07:51:06Z
dc.date.available
2021-04-08T07:51:06Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/29875
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-29616
dc.description.abstract
Background
Adolescence is a critical time for brain development. Findings from previous studies have been inconsistent, failing to distinguish the influence of pubertal status and aging on brain maturation. The current study sought to address these inconsistencies, addressing the trajectories of pubertal development and aging by longitudinally tracking structural brain development during adolescence.
Methods
Two cohorts of healthy children were recruited (cohort 1: 9-10 years old; cohort 2: 12-13 years old at baseline). MRI data were acquired for gray matter volume and white matter tract measures. To determine whether age, pubertal status, both or their interaction best modelled longitudinal data, we compared four multi-level linear regression models to the null model (general brain growth indexed by total segmented volume) using Bayesian model selection.
Results
Data were collected at baseline (n = 116), 12 months (n = 97) and 24 months (n = 84) after baseline. Findings demonstrated that the development of most regional gray matter volume, and white matter tract measures, were best modelled by age. Interestingly, precentral and paracentral regions of the cortex, as well as the accumbens demonstrated significant preference for the pubertal status model. None of the white matter tract measures were better modelled by pubertal status.
Limitations:
The major limitation of this study is the two-cohort recruitment. Although this allowed a faster coverage of the age span, a complete per person trajectory over 6 years of development (9-15 years) could not be investigated.
Conclusions
Comparing the impact of age and pubertal status on regional gray matter volume and white matter tract measures, we found age to best predict longitudinal changes. Further longitudinal studies investigating the differential influence of puberty status and age on brain development in more diverse samples are needed to replicate the present results and address mechanisms underlying norm-variants in brain development.
en
dc.format.extent
11 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Adolescent brain development
en
dc.subject
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
en
dc.subject
Gray matter volume
en
dc.subject
White matter tracts
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::150 Psychologie::150 Psychologie
dc.title
Calendar age and puberty-related development of regional gray matter volume and white matter tracts during adolescence
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00429-020-02208-1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Brain Structure & Function
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
927
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
937
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
226
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02208-1
refubium.affiliation
Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie
refubium.affiliation.other
Arbeitsbereich Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1863-2653
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1863-2661
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert