dc.contributor.author
Mueller-Schoell, Anna
dc.contributor.author
Groenland, Stefanie L.
dc.contributor.author
Scherf-Clavel, Oliver
dc.contributor.author
Dyk, Madelé van
dc.contributor.author
Huisinga, Wilhelm
dc.contributor.author
Michelet, Robin
dc.contributor.author
Jaehde, Ulrich
dc.contributor.author
Steeghs, Neeltje
dc.contributor.author
Huitema, Alwin D. R.
dc.contributor.author
Kloft, Charlotte
dc.date.accessioned
2021-04-08T07:22:06Z
dc.date.available
2021-04-08T07:22:06Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/29214
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-28962
dc.description.abstract
Purpose
This review provides an overview of the current challenges in oral targeted antineoplastic drug (OAD) dosing and outlines the unexploited value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Factors influencing the pharmacokinetic exposure in OAD therapy are depicted together with an overview of different TDM approaches. Finally, current evidence for TDM for all approved OADs is reviewed.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search (covering literature published until April 2020), including primary and secondary scientific literature on pharmacokinetics and dose individualisation strategies for OADs, together with US FDA Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Reviews and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use European Public Assessment Reports was conducted.
Results
OADs are highly potent drugs, which have substantially changed treatment options for cancer patients. Nevertheless, high pharmacokinetic variability and low treatment adherence are risk factors for treatment failure. TDM is a powerful tool to individualise drug dosing, ensure drug concentrations within the therapeutic window and increase treatment success rates. After reviewing the literature for 71 approved OADs, we show that exposure-response and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been established for the majority. Moreover, TDM has been proven to be feasible for individualised dosing of abiraterone, everolimus, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and tamoxifen in prospective studies. There is a lack of experience in how to best implement TDM as part of clinical routine in OAD cancer therapy.
Conclusion
Sub-therapeutic concentrations and severe adverse events are current challenges in OAD treatment, which can both be addressed by the application of TDM-guided dosing, ensuring concentrations within the therapeutic window.
en
dc.format.extent
24 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Targeted antineoplastic drugs
en
dc.subject
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors
en
dc.subject
Therapeutic drug monitoring
en
dc.subject
Oral anticancer drugs
en
dc.subject
Personalised medicine
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::540 Chemie::540 Chemie und zugeordnete Wissenschaften
dc.title
Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00228-020-03014-8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
441
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
464
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
77
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-03014-8
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Pharmazie
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0031-6970
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1432-1041
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert