dc.contributor.author
Sanders, Pim
dc.contributor.author
Vanderhaeghen, Wannes
dc.contributor.author
Fertner, Mette
dc.contributor.author
Fuchs, Klemens
dc.contributor.author
Obritzhauser, Walter
dc.contributor.author
Agunos, Agnes
dc.contributor.author
Carson, Carolee
dc.contributor.author
Borck Hog, Birgitte
dc.contributor.author
Dalhoff Andersen, Vibe
dc.contributor.author
Merle, Roswitha
dc.date.accessioned
2020-10-26T14:51:43Z
dc.date.available
2020-10-26T14:51:43Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/28662
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-28411
dc.description.abstract
The acknowledgment of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as a major health challenge in humans, animals and plants, has led to increased efforts to reduce antimicrobial use (AMU). To better understand factors influencing AMR and implement and evaluate stewardship measures for reducing AMU, it is important to have sufficiently detailed information on the quantity of AMU, preferably at the level of the user (farmer, veterinarian) and/or prescriber or provider (veterinarian, feed mill). Recently, several countries have established or are developing systems for monitoring AMU in animals. The aim of this publication is to provide an overview of known systems for monitoring AMU at farm-level, with a descriptive analysis of their key components and processes. As of March 2020, 38 active farm-level AMU monitoring systems from 16 countries were identified. These systems differ in many ways, including which data are collected, the type of analyses conducted and their respective output. At the same time, they share key components (data collection, analysis, benchmarking, and reporting), resulting in similar challenges to be faced with similar decisions to be made. Suggestions are provided with respect to the different components and important aspects of various data types and methods are discussed. This overview should provide support for establishing or working with such a system and could lead to a better implementation of stewardship actions and a more uniform communication about and understanding of AMU data at farm-level. Harmonization of methods and processes could lead to an improved comparability of outcomes and less confusion when interpreting results across systems. However, it is important to note that the development of systems also depends on specific local needs, resources and aims.
en
dc.format.extent
16 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
antimicrobial use
en
dc.subject
benchmarking
en
dc.subject
antimicrobial stewardship
en
dc.subject
antimicrobial resistance
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::630 Landwirtschaft::630 Landwirtschaft und verwandte Bereiche
dc.title
Monitoring of Farm-Level Antimicrobial Use to Guide Stewardship: Overview of Existing Systems and Analysis of Key Components and Processes
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
540
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3389/fvets.2020.00540
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
7
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00540
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Veterinär-Epidemiologie und Biometrie
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2297-1769
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert