dc.contributor.author
Fleischmann, Robert
dc.contributor.author
Köhn, Arvid
dc.contributor.author
Tränkner, Steffi
dc.contributor.author
Brandt, Stephan A.
dc.contributor.author
Schmidt, Sein
dc.date.accessioned
2020-10-22T13:12:27Z
dc.date.available
2020-10-22T13:12:27Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/28137
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-27887
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) provides significant benefits over classic TMS. Yet, the acquisition of individual structural magnetic resonance images (MRIindividual) is a time-consuming, expensive, and not feasible prerequisite in all subjects for spatial tracking and anatomical guidance in nTMS studies. We hypothesize that spatial transformation can be used to adjust MRI templates to individual head shapes (MRIwarped) and that TMS parameters do not differ between nTMS using MRIindividual or MRIwarped.
Materials and Methods: Twenty identical TMS sessions, each including four different navigation conditions, were conducted in 10 healthy subjects (one female, 27.4 ± 3.8 years), i.e., twice per subject by two researchers to additionally assess interrater reliabilities. MRIindividual were acquired for all subjects. MRIwarped were obtained through the spatial transformation of a template MRI following a 5-, 9-and 36-point head surface registration (MRIwarped_5, MRIwarped_9, MRIwarped_36). Stimulation hotspot locations, resting motor threshold (RMT), 500 μV motor threshold (500 μV-MT), and mean absolute motor evoked potential difference (MAD) of primary motor cortex (M1) examinations were compared between nTMS using either MRIwarped variants or MRIindividual and non-navigated TMS.
Results: M1 hotspots were spatially consistent between MRIindividual and MRIwarped_36 (insignificant deviation by 4.79 ± 2.62 mm). MEP thresholds and variance were also equivalent between MRIindividual and MRIwarped_36 with mean differences of RMT by -0.05 ± 2.28% maximum stimulator output (%MSO; t (19) = -0.09, p = 0.923), 500 μV-MT by -0.15 ± 1.63%MSO (t (19) = -0.41, p = 0.686) and MAD by 70.5 ± 214.38 μV (t (19) = 1.47, p = 0.158). Intraclass correlations (ICC) of motor thresholds were between 0.88 and 0.97.
Conclusions: NTMS examinations of M1 yield equivalent topographical and functional results using MRIindividual and MRIwarped if a sufficient number of registration points are used.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
transcranial magnetic stimulation
en
dc.subject
spatial transformation
en
dc.subject
primary motor cortex
en
dc.subject
motor evoked potentials
en
dc.subject
template magnetic resonance images
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Individualized Template MRI Is a Valid and Reliable Alternative to Individual MRI for Spatial Tracking in Navigated TMS Studies in Healthy Subjects
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
174
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3389/fnhum.2020.00174
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Frontiers Media S.A.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
14
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32477086
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1662-5161