dc.contributor.author
Engelmann, Cornelius
dc.contributor.author
Sterneck, Martina
dc.contributor.author
Weiss, Karl Heinz
dc.contributor.author
Templin, Silke
dc.contributor.author
Zopf, Steffen
dc.contributor.author
Denk, Gerald
dc.contributor.author
Eurich, Dennis
dc.contributor.author
Pratschke, Johann
dc.contributor.author
Weiss, Johannes
dc.contributor.author
Braun, Felix
dc.contributor.author
Welker, Martin-Walter
dc.contributor.author
Zimmermann, Tim
dc.contributor.author
Knipper, Petra
dc.contributor.author
Nierhof, Dirk
dc.contributor.author
Lorf, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Jäckel, Elmar
dc.contributor.author
Hau, Hans-Michael
dc.contributor.author
Tsui, Tung Yu
dc.contributor.author
Perrakis, Aristoteles
dc.contributor.author
Schlitt, Hans-Jürgen
dc.contributor.author
Herzer, Kerstin
dc.contributor.author
Tacke, Frank
dc.date.accessioned
2020-09-11T12:20:46Z
dc.date.available
2020-09-11T12:20:46Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/28114
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-27864
dc.description.abstract
Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity in human liver transplant recipients. Anti-CMV therapeutics can be used to prevent or treat CMV in liver transplant recipients, but their toxicity needs to be balanced against the benefits. The choice of prevention strategy (prophylaxis or preemptive treatment) depends on the donor/recipient sero-status but may vary between institutions. We conducted a series of consultations and roundtable discussions with German liver transplant center representatives. Based on 20 out of 22 centers, we herein summarize the current approaches to CMV prevention and treatment in the context of liver transplantation in Germany. In 90% of centers, transient prophylaxis with ganciclovir or valganciclovir was standard of care in high-risk (donor CMV positive, recipient CMV naive) settings, while preemptive therapy (based on CMV viremia detected during (bi) weekly PCR testing for circulating CMV-DNA) was preferred in moderate- and low-risk settings. Duration of prophylaxis or intense surveillance was 3-6 months. In the case of CMV infection, immunosuppression was adapted. In most centers, antiviral treatment was initiated based on PCR results (median threshold value of 1000 copies/mL) with or without symptoms. Therefore, German transplant centers report similar approaches to the prevention and management of CMV infection in liver transplantation.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
valganciclovir
en
dc.subject
mTOR inhibitor
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Prevention and Management of CMV Infections after Liver Transplantation: Current Practice in German Transplant Centers
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
2352
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/jcm9082352
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Clinical Medicine
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI AG
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
9
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32717978
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2077-0383