dc.contributor.author
Kroll, Lisa
dc.contributor.author
Böhning, Nikolaus
dc.contributor.author
Müßigbrodt, Heidi
dc.contributor.author
Stahl, Maria
dc.contributor.author
Halkin, Pavel
dc.contributor.author
Liehr, Birgit
dc.contributor.author
Grunow, Christine
dc.contributor.author
Kujumdshieva-Böhning, Borjana
dc.contributor.author
Freise, Christian
dc.contributor.author
Hopfenmüller, Werner
dc.contributor.author
Friesdorf, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.author
Jockers-Scherübl, Maria
dc.contributor.author
Somasundaram, Rajan
dc.date.accessioned
2020-07-29T12:14:49Z
dc.date.available
2020-07-29T12:14:49Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/27836
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-27589
dc.description.abstract
Background
Agitation is common in geriatric patients with cognitive impairment, e.g. in persons with dementia (PWD), who are admitted to an emergency department (ED). It might be a first sign of upcoming delirium and is associated with a higher risk of an unfavorable clinical course. Hence, monitoring of vital signs and enhanced movement as indicators of upcoming agitation is essential in these patients during their stay in the ED. Since PWD rarely tolerate fixed monitoring devices, a novel developed non-contact monitoring system (NCMSys) might represent an appropriate alternative.
Aim of this feasibility study was to test the validity of a NCMSys and of the tent-like “Charité Dome” (ChD), aimed to shelter PWD from the busy ED environment. Furthermore, effects of the ChD on wellbeing and agitation of PWD were investigated.
Methods
Both devices were attached to patient’s bed. Tests on technical validity and safety issues of NCMSys and ChD were performed at the iDoc institute with six healthy volunteers. A feasibility study evaluating the reliability of the NCMSys with and without the ChD was performed in the real-life setting of an ED and on a geriatric-gerontopsychiatric ward. 19 patients were included, ten males and nine females; mean age: 77.4 (55–93) years of which 14 were PWD. PWD inclusion criteria were age ≥ 55 years, a dementia diagnosis and a written consent (by patients or by a custodian). Exclusion criteria were acute life-threatening situations and a missing consent.
Results
Measurements of heart rate, changes in movement and sound emissions by the NCMSys were valid, whereas patient movements affected respiratory rate measurements. The ChD did not impact patients’ vital signs or movements in our study setting. However, 53% of the PWD (7/13) and most of the patients without dementia (4/5) benefited from its use regarding their agitation and overall wellbeing.
Conclusions
The results of this feasibility study encourage a future controlled clinical trial in geriatric ED patients, including PWD, to further evaluate if our concept of non-contact measurement of vital signs and movement combined with the “Charité Dome” helps to prevent upcoming agitation in this vulnerable patient group in the ED.
Trial registration
ICTRP: “Charité-Dome-Study - DRKS00014737” (retrospectively registered).
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Geriatric care
en
dc.subject
Non-contact monitoring
en
dc.subject
Emergency department
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
165
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s12888-020-02573-5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
BMC Psychiatry
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
BMC
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
20
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32295567
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1471-244X