dc.contributor.author
Behrens, Jan P.
dc.contributor.author
Olteteanu, Ana-Maria
dc.date.accessioned
2020-12-03T10:18:57Z
dc.date.available
2020-12-03T10:18:57Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/27641
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-27395
dc.description.abstract
The Remote Associates Test (RAT, CRA) is a classical creativity test used to measure creativity as a function of associative ability. The RAT has been administered in different languages. Nonetheless, because of how embedded in the language the test is, only a few items are directly translatable, and most of the time the RAT is created anew in each language. This process of manual (and in two cases computational) creation of RAT items is guided by the researchers’ understanding of the task. However, are the RAT items in different languages comparable? In this paper, different RAT stimuli datasets are analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Significant differences are observed between certain datasets in terms of solver performance. The potential sources of these differences are discussed, together with what this means for creativity psychometrics and computational vs. manual creation of stimuli.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
remote associates test
en
dc.subject
Creativity evaluation
en
dc.subject
creativity metrics
en
dc.subject
Creativity test
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::150 Psychologie::150 Psychologie
dc.title
Are all Remote Associates Test equal?
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dc.title.subtitle
An overview of the Remote Associates Test in different languages
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
1125
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01125
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Frontiers in Psychology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
11
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01125
refubium.affiliation
Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1664-1078
dcterms.isPartOf.zdb
2563826-9