dc.contributor.author
Karbysheva, Svetlana
dc.contributor.author
Di Luca, Mariagrazia
dc.contributor.author
Eugenia Butini, Maria
dc.contributor.author
Winkler, Tobias
dc.contributor.author
Schütz, Michael
dc.contributor.author
Trampuz, Andrej
dc.date.accessioned
2020-07-15T12:48:28Z
dc.date.available
2020-07-15T12:48:28Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/27434
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-27190
dc.description.abstract
The diagnosis of implant-associated infections is hampered due to microbial adherence and biofilm formation on the implant surface. Sonication of explanted devices was shown to improve the microbiological diagnosis by physical removal of biofilms. Recently, chemical agents have been investigated for biofilm dislodgement such as the chelating agent ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and the reducing agent dithiothreitol (DTT). We compared the activity of chemical methods for biofilm dislodgement to sonication in an established in vitro model of artificial biofilm. Biofilm-producing laboratory strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 35984), S. aureus (ATCC 43300), E. coli (ATCC 25922) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 53278) were used. After 3 days of biofilm formation, porous glass beads were exposed to control (0.9% NaCl), sonication or chemical agents. Quantitative and qualitative biofilm analyses were performed by colony counting, isothermal microcalorimetry and scanning electron microscopy. Recovered colony counts after treatment with EDTA and DTT were similar to those after exposure to 0.9% NaCl for biofilms of S. epidermidis (6.3 and 6.1 vs. 6.0 log10 CFU/mL, S. aureus (6.4 and 6.3 vs. 6.3 log10 CFU/mL), E. coli (5.2 and 5.1 vs. 5.1 log10 CFU/mL and P. aeruginosa (5.1 and 5.2 vs. 5.0 log10 CFU/mL, respectively). In contrast, with sonication higher CFU counts were detected with all tested microorganisms (7.5, 7.3, 6.2 and 6.5 log10 CFU/mL, respectively) (p <0.05). Concordant results were observed with isothermal microcalorimetry and scanning electron microscopy. In conclusion, sonication is superior to both tested chemical methods (EDTA and DTT) for dislodgement of S. epidermidis, S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa biofilms. Future studies may evaluate potential additive effect of chemical dislodgement to sonication.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
chemical biofilm dislodgement methods
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Comparison of Sonication With Chemical Biofilm Dislodgement Methods Using Chelating and Reducing Agents: Implications for the Microbiological Diagnosis of Implant Associated Infection
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
e0231389
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pone.0231389
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
PLoS ONE
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
15
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32267888
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1932-6203