dc.contributor.author
Engel, Leif-Christopher
dc.contributor.author
Landmesser, Ulf
dc.contributor.author
Abdelwahed, Youssef S.
dc.contributor.author
Jaguszewski, Milosz
dc.contributor.author
Gigengack, Kevin
dc.contributor.author
Wurster, Thomas-Heinrich
dc.contributor.author
Skurk, Carsten
dc.contributor.author
Manes, Costantina
dc.contributor.author
Schuster, Andreas
dc.contributor.author
Noutsias, Michel
dc.contributor.author
Hamm, Bernd
dc.contributor.author
Botnar, Rene M.
dc.contributor.author
Makowski, Marcus R.
dc.contributor.author
Bigalke, Boris
dc.date.accessioned
2020-06-08T13:32:17Z
dc.date.available
2020-06-08T13:32:17Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/27421
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-27177
dc.description.abstract
Background
There is limited knowledge about morphological molecular-imaging-derived parameters to further characterize hemodynamically relevant coronary lesions.
Objective
The aim of this study was to describe and differentiate specific parameters between hemodynamically significant and non-significant coronary lesions using various invasive and non-invasive measures.
Methods
This clinical study analyzed patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent native T1-weighted CMR and gadofosveset-enhanced CMR as well as invasive coronary angiography. OCT of the culprit vessel to determine the plaque type was performed in a subset of patients. Functional relevance of all lesions was examined using quantitative flow reserve (QFR-angiography). Hemodynamically significant lesions were defined as lesions with a QFR <0.8. Signal intensity (contrast-to-noise ratios; CNRs) on native T1-weighted CMR and gadofosveset-enhanced CMR was defined as a measure for intraplaque hemorrhage and endothelial permeability, respectively.
Results
Overall 29 coronary segments from 14 patients were examined. Segments containing lesions with a QFR <0.8 (n = 9) were associated with significantly higher signal enhancement on Gadofosveset-enhanced CMR as compared to segments containing a lesions without significant stenosis (lesion-QFR>0.8; n = 19) (5.32 (4.47–7.02) vs. 2.42 (1.04–5.11); p = 0.042). No differences in signal enhancement were seen on native T1-weighted CMR (2.2 (0.68–6.75) vs. 2.09 (0.91–6.57), p = 0.412). 66.7% (4 out of 6) of all vulnerable plaque and 33.3% (2 out of 6) of all non-vulnerable plaque (fibroatheroma) as assessed by OCT were hemodynamically significant lesions.
Conclusion
The findings of this pilot study suggest that signal enhancement on albumin-binding probe-enhanced CMR but not on T1-weighted CMR is associated with hemodynamically relevant coronary lesions
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Coronary Angiography
en
dc.subject
Coronary Artery Disease
en
dc.subject
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
en
dc.subject
Hemodynamics
en
dc.subject
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
en
dc.subject
Multimodal Imaging
en
dc.subject
Organometallic Compounds
en
dc.subject
Tomography, Optical Coherence
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Comprehensive multimodality characterization of hemodynamically significant and non-significant coronary lesions using invasive and noninvasive measures
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
e0228292
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pone.0228292
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
PLOS ONE
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
15
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32004345
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1932-6203