dc.contributor.author
Bethke, Annalena
dc.contributor.author
Pieralli, Stefano
dc.contributor.author
Kohal, Ralf‐Joachim
dc.contributor.author
Burkhardt, Felix
dc.contributor.author
Stein‐Lausnitz, Manja von
dc.contributor.author
Vach, Kirstin
dc.contributor.author
Spies, Benedikt Christopher
dc.date.accessioned
2020-03-18T14:58:25Z
dc.date.available
2020-03-18T14:58:25Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/26991
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-26752
dc.description.abstract
Various protocols are available to preclinically assess the fracture resistance of zirconia oral implants. The objective of the present review was to determine the impact of different treatments (dynamic loading, hydrothermal aging) and implant features (e.g., material, design or manufacturing) on the fracture resistance of zirconia implants. An electronic screening of two databases (MEDLINE/Pubmed, Embase) was performed. Investigations including > 5 screw-shaped implants providing information to calculate the bending moment at the time point of static loading to fracture were considered. Data was extracted and meta-analyses were conducted using multilevel mixed-effects generalized linear models (GLMs). The Šidák method was used to correct for multiple testing. The initial search resulted in 1864 articles, and finally 19 investigations loading 731 zirconia implants to fracture were analyzed. In general, fracture resistance was affected by the implant design (1-piece > 2-piece, p = 0.004), material (alumina-toughened zirconia/ATZ > yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal/Y-TZP, p = 0.002) and abutment preparation (untouched > modified/grinded, p < 0.001). In case of 2-piece implants, the amount of dynamic loading cycles prior to static loading (p < 0.001) or anatomical crown supply (p < 0.001) negatively affected the outcome. No impact was found for hydrothermal aging. Heterogeneous findings of the present review highlight the importance of thoroughly and individually evaluating the fracture resistance of every zirconia implant system prior to market release.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
dental implant
en
dc.subject
artificial mouth
en
dc.subject
fracture load
en
dc.subject
chewing simulation
en
dc.subject
meta‐analysis
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Oral Implants In Vitro: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
562
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/ma13030562
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Materials
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI AG
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
13
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
31991565
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1996-1944