dc.contributor.author
Flechsig, Mandy
dc.contributor.author
Ruf, Tobias F.
dc.contributor.author
Troeger, Willi
dc.contributor.author
Wiedemann, Stephan
dc.contributor.author
Quick, Silvio
dc.contributor.author
Ibrahim, Karim
dc.contributor.author
Pfluecke, Christian
dc.contributor.author
Youssef, Akram
dc.contributor.author
Sveric, Krunoslav M.
dc.contributor.author
Winzer, Robert
dc.contributor.author
Heinzel, Frank R.
dc.contributor.author
Linke, Axel
dc.contributor.author
Strasser, Ruth H.
dc.contributor.author
Zhang, Kun
dc.contributor.author
Heidrich, Felix M.
dc.date.accessioned
2020-01-27T15:30:55Z
dc.date.available
2020-01-27T15:30:55Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/26524
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-26284
dc.description.abstract
BACKGROUND:
Peri-interventional myocardial injury occurs frequently during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We assessed the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on myocardial injury, acute kidney injury (AKIN) and 6-month mortality in patients undergoing TAVI.
METHODS:
We performed a prospective single-center controlled trial. Sixty-six patients treated with RIPC prior to TAVI were enrolled in the study and were matched to a control group by propensity-score. RIPC was applied to the upper extremity using a conventional tourniquet. Myocardial injury was assessed using high-sensitive troponin-T (hsTnT), and kidney injury was assessed using serum creatinine levels. Data were compared with the Wilcoxon-Rank and McNemar tests. Mortality was analysed with the log-rank test.
RESULTS:
TAVI led to a significant rise of hsTnT across all patients (p < 0.001). No significant inter-group difference in maximum troponin release or areas-under-the-curve was detected. Medtronic CoreValve and Edwards Sapien valves showed similar peri-interventional troponin kinetics and patients receiving neither valve did benefit from RIPC. AKIN occurred in one RIPC patient and four non-RIPC patients (p = 0.250). No significant difference in 6-month mortality was observed. No adverse events related to RIPC were recorded.
CONCLUSION:
Our data do not show a beneficial role of RIPC in TAVI patients for cardio- or renoprotection, or improved survival.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
aortic valve stenosis
en
dc.subject
transcatheter aortic valve replacement
en
dc.subject
ischemic preconditioning
en
dc.subject
bioprosthesis
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Neither Improves Survival nor Reduces Myocardial or Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
160
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/jcm9010160
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Clinical Medicine
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI AG
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
9
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
31936060
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2077-0383