dc.contributor.author
Francuzik, Wojciech
dc.contributor.author
Dölle-Bierke, Sabine
dc.contributor.author
Knop, Macarena
dc.contributor.author
Scherer Hofmeier, Kathrin
dc.contributor.author
Cichocka-Jarosz, Ewa
dc.contributor.author
Garcia, Blanca E.
dc.contributor.author
Lang, Roland
dc.contributor.author
Maris, Ioana
dc.contributor.author
Renaudin, Jean-Marie
dc.contributor.author
Worm, Margitta
dc.date.accessioned
2019-12-11T15:29:22Z
dc.date.available
2019-12-11T15:29:22Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/26090
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-25850
dc.description.abstract
Refractory anaphylaxis (unresponsive to treatment with at least two doses of minimum 300 μg adrenaline) is a rare and often fatal hypersensitivity reaction. Comprehensive data on its definition, prevalence, and risk factors are missing. Using the data from the European Anaphylaxis Registry (11,596 cases in total) we identified refractory anaphylaxis cases (n = 42) and analyzed these in comparison to a control group of severe anaphylaxis cases (n = 4,820). The data show that drugs more frequently elicited refractory anaphylaxis (50% of cases, p < 0.0001) compared to other severe anaphylaxis cases (19.7%). Cases elicited by insects (n = 8) were more often due to bees than wasps in refractory cases (62.5 vs. 19.4%, p = 0.009). The refractory cases occurred mostly in a perioperative setting (45.2 vs. 9.05, p < 0.0001). Intramuscular adrenaline (as a first line therapy) was administered in 16.7% of refractory cases, whereas in 83.3% of cases it was applied intravenously (significantly more often than in severe anaphylaxis cases: 12.3%, p < 0.0001). Second line treatment options (e.g., vasopression with dopamine, methylene blue, glucagon) were not used at all for the treatment of refractory cases. The mortality rate in refractory anaphylaxis was significantly higher (26.2%) than in severe cases (0.353%, p < 0.0001). Refractory anaphylaxis is associated with drug-induced anaphylaxis in particular if allergens are given intravenously. Although physicians frequently use adrenaline in cases of perioperative anaphylaxis, not all patients are responding to treatment. Whether a delay in recognition of anaphylaxis is responsible for the refractory case or whether these cases are due to an overflow with mast cell activating substances-requires further studies. Reasons for the low use of second-line medication (i.e., methylene blue or dopamine) in refractory cases are unknown, but their use might improve the outcome of severe refractory anaphylaxis cases.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
adrenaline (epinephrine)
en
dc.subject
beta-blockers
en
dc.subject
drug allergic reactions
en
dc.subject
insect venom allergy
en
dc.subject
vasoconstriction
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Refractory Anaphylaxis: Data From the European Anaphylaxis Registry
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
2482
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3389/fimmu.2019.02482
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Frontiers in Immunology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Frontiers Media S.A.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
10
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
31749797
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1664-3224