dc.contributor.author
Lehnerer, Sophie
dc.contributor.author
Hotter, Benjamin
dc.contributor.author
Padberg, Inken
dc.contributor.author
Knispel, Petra
dc.contributor.author
Remstedt, Dike
dc.contributor.author
Liebenau, Andrea
dc.contributor.author
Grittner, Ulrike
dc.contributor.author
Wellwood, Ian
dc.contributor.author
Meisel, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned
2019-09-16T14:43:18Z
dc.date.available
2019-09-16T14:43:18Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/25566
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-25336
dc.description.abstract
Background: Stroke patients are often affected by long-term disabilities with needs concerning social issues. There
is relatively little consideration of social recovery of patients and the support required to return to work, receive
social benefits, participate in daily life activities, maintain contact with family and friends and to organize financial
affairs. In our study we aimed to investigate if existing tools record social needs adequately. We analyzed the
current provision of social support provided in long-term care after stroke and whether unmet social needs were
associated with quality of life, caregiver burden, overall function and degree of disability.
Methods: Our analysis is part of the Managing Aftercare of Stroke study (MAS-I), a cross-sectional exploratory study
of patient needs 2–3 years after initial stroke. Assessment tools included the Nikolaus-score (social situation), the
EuroQoL (quality of life), the German Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (caregiver burden), the modified Rankin
Scale (disability / dependence), Stroke Impact Scale (function and degree of disability) and the Stroke Survivor
Needs Questionnaire (unmet needs).
Results: Overall 57 patients were included in MAS-I, with ten patients classified in urgent need of socio-economic
support according to the Nikolaus-score. Patients with lower than normal Nikolaus-score had a higher degree of
disability. Thirty percent of all patients had never received professional social support. Social worker contact
happened mostly during the stay in acute hospital or rehabilitation institution. Only four patients (11%) reported
long-term support after discharge. Apart from social worker contact during acute care, 43% of patients had unmet
needs in the long-term aftercare. Forty percent of all patients included in MAS-I were recommended for social work
intervention after an in-depth analysis of their situation. Finally, we saw that unmet social needs were associated
with lower quality of life and higher caregiver burden.
Conclusions: Our data suggest significant unmet needs in social care in long-term stroke patients. Screening tools
for unmet social needs such as the Nikolaus-score do not holistically report patients’ needs.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Long-term care
en
dc.subject
Social situation
en
dc.subject
Unmet social needs
en
dc.subject
Assessment tools
en
dc.subject
Screening social work
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Social work support and unmet social needs in life after stroke: a cross-sectional exploratory study
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
220
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s12883-019-1451-y
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
BMC Neurology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
BMC
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
19
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
31492151
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1471-2377