dc.contributor.author
Krenzien, Felix
dc.contributor.author
Keshi, Eriselda
dc.contributor.author
Splith, Katrin
dc.contributor.author
Griesel, Silvan
dc.contributor.author
Kamali, Kaan
dc.contributor.author
Sauer, Igor M.
dc.contributor.author
Feldbrügge, Linda
dc.contributor.author
Pratschke, Johann
dc.contributor.author
Leder, Annekatrin
dc.contributor.author
Schmelzle, Moritz
dc.date.accessioned
2019-06-06T08:50:20Z
dc.date.available
2019-06-06T08:50:20Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/24690
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-2450
dc.description.abstract
Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection following liver transplantation. Background: Noninvasive blood and urine markers have been widely explored in recent decades for diagnosing acute rejection after liver transplantation. However, none have been translated into routine clinical use so far due to uncertain diagnostic accuracy, and liver biopsy remains the gold standard. Methods: Systematic literature searches of Medline, Cochrane and Embase were conducted up to February 2019 to identify studies evaluating the use of noninvasive markers in diagnosing allograft rejection following liver transplantation. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with DerSimonian-Laird weighting and the hierarchical summary receiver operating curve. Results: Of 560 identified studies, 15 studies (1,445 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The following markers were tested: acid labile nitroso-compounds (NOx), serum amyloid A protein, procalcitonin, peripheral blood eosinophil count, peripheral blood T-cell activation and interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor, guanylate-binding protein-2 mRNA, graft-derived cell-free DNA, pi-glutathione S-transferase, alpha-glutathione S-transferase and serum HLA class I soluble antigens. Only eosinophil count was tested in multiple studies, and they demonstrated high heterogeneity (I-2 = 72% [95% CI: 0.5-0.99]). IL-2 receptor demonstrated the highest sensitivity (89% [95% CI: 0.78-0.96]) and specificity (81% [95% CI: 0.69-0.89]). Conclusion: IL-2 receptor expression demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, while the peripheral eosinophil count was the only marker tested in more than one study. Presently, liver biopsy remains superior to noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers as most studies exhibited inferior designs, hindering possible translation into clinical application.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
liver transplantation
en
dc.subject
acute rejection
en
dc.subject
diagnostic biomarker
en
dc.subject
diagnostic accuracy
en
dc.subject
non-invasive test
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
758
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3389/fimmu.2019.00758
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Frontiers in Immunology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Frontiers Media S.A.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
10
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
31031758
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1664-3224