dc.contributor.author
Frantz, David
dc.contributor.author
Stellmes, Marion
dc.contributor.author
Hostert, Patrick
dc.date.accessioned
2019-02-28T09:30:25Z
dc.date.available
2019-02-28T09:30:25Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/23957
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-1732
dc.description.abstract
Analysis Ready Data (ARD) have undergone the most relevant pre-processing steps to satisfy most user demands. The freely available software FORCE (Framework for Operational Radiometric Correction for Environmental monitoring) is capable of generating Landsat ARD. An essential step of generating ARD is atmospheric correction, which requires water vapor data. FORCE relies on a water vapor database obtained from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). However, two major drawbacks arise from this strategy: (1) The database has to be compiled for each study area prior to generating ARD; and (2) MODIS and Landsat commissioning dates are not well aligned. We have therefore compiled an application-ready global water vapor database to significantly increase the operational readiness of ARD production. The free dataset comprises daily water vapor data for February 2000 to July 2018 as well as a monthly climatology that is used if no daily value is available. We systematically assessed the impact of using this climatology on surface reflectance outputs. A global random sample of Landsat 5/7/8 imagery was processed twice (i) using daily water vapor (reference) and (ii) using the climatology (estimate), followed by computing accuracy, precision, and uncertainty (APU) metrics. All APU measures were well below specification, thus the fallback usage of the climatology is generally a sound strategy. Still, the tests revealed that some considerations need to be taken into account to help quantify which sensor, band, climate, and season are most or least affected by using a fallback climatology. The highest uncertainty and bias is found for Landsat 5, with progressive improvements towards newer sensors. The bias increases from dry to humid climates, whereas uncertainty increases from dry and tropic to temperate climates. Uncertainty is smallest during seasons with low variability, and is highest when atmospheric conditions progress from a dry to a wet season (and vice versa).
en
dc.format.extent
18 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
atmospheric correction
en
dc.subject
analysis ready data
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::550 Geowissenschaften, Geologie::550 Geowissenschaften
dc.title
A Global MODIS Water Vapor Database for the Operational Atmospheric Correction of Historic and Recent Landsat Imagery
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
257
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/rs11030257
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Remote Sensing
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
11
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030257
refubium.affiliation
Geowissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Geographische Wissenschaften
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access