dc.contributor.author
Menzel, Randolf
dc.contributor.author
Tison, Lea
dc.contributor.author
Fischer-Nakai, Johannes
dc.contributor.author
Cheeseman, James
dc.contributor.author
Sol Balbuena, Maria
dc.contributor.author
Chen, Xiuxian
dc.contributor.author
Landgraf, Tim
dc.contributor.author
Petrasch, Julian
dc.contributor.author
Polster, Johannes
dc.contributor.author
Greggers, Uwe
dc.date.accessioned
2019-01-18T14:52:26Z
dc.date.available
2019-01-18T14:52:26Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/23738
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-1525
dc.description.abstract
Elongated landscape features like forest edges, rivers, roads or boundaries of fields are particularly salient landmarks for navigating animals. Here, we ask how honeybees learn such structures and how they are used during their homing flights after being released at an unexpected location (catch-and-release paradigm). The experiments were performed in two landscapes that differed with respect to their overall structure: a rather feature-less landscape, and one rich in close and far distant landmarks. We tested three different forms of learning: learning during orientation flights, learning during training to a feeding site, and learning during homing flights after release at an unexpected site within the explored area. We found that bees use elongated ground structures, e.g., a field boundary separating two pastures close to the hive (Experiment 1), an irrigation channel (Experiment 2), a hedgerow along which the bees were trained (Experiment 3), a gravel road close to the hive and the feeder (Experiment 4), a path along an irrigation channel with its vegetation close to the feeder (Experiment 5) and a gravel road along which bees performed their homing flights (Experiment 6). Discrimination and generalization between the learned linear landmarks and similar ones in the test area depend on their object properties (irrigation channel, gravel road, hedgerow) and their compass orientation. We conclude that elongated ground structures are embedded into multiple landscape features indicating that memory of these linear structures is one component of bee navigation. Elongated structures interact and compete with other references. Object identification is an important part of this process. The objects are characterized not only by their appearance but also by their alignment in the compass. Their salience is highest if both components are close to what had been learned. High similarity in appearance can compensate for (partial) compass misalignment, and vice versa.
en
dc.format.extent
14 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
guiding landmarks
en
dc.subject
object recognition
en
dc.subject
ground structures
en
dc.subject
compass alignment
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::590 Tiere (Zoologie)::591 Einzelne Themen in der Naturgeschichte
dc.title
Guidance of Navigating Honeybees by Learned Elongated Ground Structures
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
322
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00322
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
12
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00322
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
refubium.affiliation
Mathematik und Informatik
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Biologie
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Informatik
refubium.funding
Institutional Participation
refubium.funding.id
Frontiers
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin und der DFG gefördert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1662-5153