dc.contributor.author
Otte, Karen
dc.contributor.author
Kayser, Bastian
dc.contributor.author
Mansow-Model, Sebastian
dc.contributor.author
Verrel, Julius
dc.contributor.author
Paul, Friedemann
dc.contributor.author
Brandt, Alexander U.
dc.contributor.author
Schmitz-Hubsch, Tanja
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T11:04:16Z
dc.date.available
2017-01-13T12:41:28.075Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/21571
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-24861
dc.description.abstract
Background The introduction of low cost optical 3D motion tracking sensors
provides new options for effective quantification of motor dysfunction.
Objective The present study aimed to evaluate the Kinect V2 sensor against a
gold standard motion capture system with respect to accuracy of tracked
landmark movements and accuracy and repeatability of derived clinical
parameters. Methods Nineteen healthy subjects were concurrently recorded with
a Kinect V2 sensor and an optical motion tracking system (Vicon). Six
different movement tasks were recorded with 3D full-body kinematics from both
systems. Tasks included walking in different conditions, balance and adaptive
postural control. After temporal and spatial alignment, agreement of movements
signals was described by Pearson’s correlation coefficient and signal to noise
ratios per dimension. From these movement signals, 45 clinical parameters were
calculated, including ranges of motions, torso sway, movement velocities and
cadence. Accuracy of parameters was described as absolute agreement,
consistency agreement and limits of agreement. Intra-session reliability of 3
to 5 measurement repetitions was described as repeatability coefficient and
standard error of measurement for each system. Results Accuracy of Kinect V2
landmark movements was moderate to excellent and depended on movement
dimension, landmark location and performed task. Signal to noise ratio
provided information about Kinect V2 landmark stability and indicated larger
noise behaviour in feet and ankles. Most of the derived clinical parameters
showed good to excellent absolute agreement (30 parameters showed ICC(3,1) >
0.7) and consistency (38 parameters showed r > 0.7) between both systems.
Conclusion Given that this system is low-cost, portable and does not require
any sensors to be attached to the body, it could provide numerous advantages
when compared to established marker- or wearable sensor based system. The
Kinect V2 has the potential to be used as a reliable and valid clinical
measurement tool.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Accuracy and Reliability of the Kinect Version 2 for Clinical Measurement of
Motor Function
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
PLoS ONE. - 11 (2016), 11, Artikel Nr. e0166532
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pone.0166532
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166532
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000026143
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer reinen Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000007528
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access