dc.contributor.author
Kuhlmann, Ellen
dc.contributor.author
Ovseiko, Pavel V.
dc.contributor.author
Kurmeyer, Christine
dc.contributor.author
Gutierrez-Lobos, Karin
dc.contributor.author
Steinboeck, Sandra
dc.contributor.author
von Knorring, Mia
dc.contributor.author
Buchan, Alastair M.
dc.contributor.author
Brommels, Mats
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T10:58:33Z
dc.date.available
2017-02-16T11:14:50.635Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/21421
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-24714
dc.description.abstract
Background Women’s participation in medicine and the need for gender equality
in healthcare are increasingly recognised, yet little attention is paid to
leadership and management positions in large publicly funded academic health
centres. This study illustrates such a need, taking the case of four large
European centres: Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Germany), Karolinska
Institutet (Sweden), Medizinische Universität Wien (Austria), and Oxford
Academic Health Science Centre (United Kingdom). Case The percentage of female
medical students and doctors in all four countries is now well within the
40–60% gender balance zone. Women are less well represented among specialists
and remain significantly under-represented among senior doctors and full
professors. All four centres have made progress in closing the gender
leadership gap on boards and other top-level decision-making bodies, but a
gender leadership gap remains relevant. The level of achieved gender balance
varies significantly between the centres and largely mirrors country-specific
welfare state models, with more equal gender relations in Sweden than in the
other countries. Notably, there are also similar trends across countries and
centres: gender inequality is stronger within academic enterprises than within
hospital enterprises and stronger in middle management than at the top level.
These novel findings reveal fissures in the ‘glass ceiling’ effects at top-
level management, while the barriers for women shift to middle-level
management and remain strong in academic positions. The uneven shifts in the
leadership gap are highly relevant and have policy implications. Conclusion
Setting gender balance objectives exclusively for top-level decision-making
bodies may not effectively promote a wider goal of gender equality. Academic
health centres should pay greater attention to gender equality as an issue of
organisational performance and good leadership at all levels of management,
with particular attention to academic enterprises and newly created management
structures. Developing comprehensive gender-sensitive health workforce
monitoring systems and comparing progress across academic health centres in
Europe could help to identify the gender leadership gap and utilise health
human resources more effectively.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Women in medicine
dc.subject
Women in science
dc.subject
Gender equality
dc.subject
Medical management
dc.subject
Academic medicine
dc.subject
Academic health centres
dc.subject
European Union
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Closing the gender leadership gap
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
Human Resources for Health. - 15 (2017), Artikek Nr. 2
dc.title.subtitle
a multi-centre cross-country comparison of women in management and leadership
in academic health centres in the European Union
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s12960-016-0175-y
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://human-resources-health.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12960-016-0175-y
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000026354
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer reinen Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000007687
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access