dc.contributor.author
Fleckenstein, Florian Nima
dc.contributor.author
Schernthaner, Ruediger Egbert
dc.contributor.author
Duran, Rafael
dc.contributor.author
Sohn, Jae Ho
dc.contributor.author
Sahu, Sonia
dc.contributor.author
Marshall, Karen
dc.contributor.author
Lin, MingDe
dc.contributor.author
Gebauer, Bernhard
dc.contributor.author
Chapiro, Julius
dc.contributor.author
Salem, Riad
dc.contributor.author
Geschwind, Jean-Francois
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T10:46:03Z
dc.date.available
2017-01-05T11:15:55.824Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/21059
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-24356
dc.description.abstract
PURPOSE Liver metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are not uncommon in
the course of disease. However, data about tumor response to intraarterial
therapy (IAT) are scarce. This study assessed whether changes of enhancing
tumor volume using quantitative European Association for the Study of the
Liver (qEASL) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT)
can evaluate tumor response and predict overall survival (OS) early after
therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fourteen patients with liver metastatic RCC
treated with IAT (transarterial chemoembolization: n= 9 and yttrium-90: n= 5)
were retrospectively included. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced
imaging (MRI: n= 10 and CT: n= 4) 3 to 4 weeks pre- and posttreatment.
Response to treatment was evaluated on the arterial phase using Response
Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), World Health Organization,
modified RECIST, EASL, tumor volume, and qEASL. Paired t test was used to
compare measurements pre- and post-IAT. Patients were stratified into
responders (≥65% decrease in qEASL) and nonresponders (<65% decrease in
qEASL). OS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test and the
Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS Mean qEASL (cm3) decreased from 93.5 to
67.2 cm3 (P= .004) and mean qEASL (%) from 63.1% to 35.6% (P= .001). No
significant changes were observed using other response criteria. qEASL was the
only significant predictor of OS when used to stratify patients into
responders and nonresponders with median OS of 31.9 versus 11.1 months (hazard
ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.97; P= .042) for qEASL
(cm3) and 29.9 versus 10.2 months (HR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.74; P= .025) for
qEASL (%). CONCLUSION Three-dimensional (3D) quantitative tumor analysis is a
reliable predictor of OS when assessing treatment response after IAT in
patients with RCC metastatic to the liver. qEASL outperforms conventional non-
3D methods and can be used as a surrogate marker for OS early after therapy.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic to the Liver
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
Translational Oncology. - 9 (2016), 5, S. 377–383
dc.title.subtitle
Early Response Assessment after Intraarterial Therapy Using 3D Quantitative
Tumor Enhancement Analysis
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1016/j.tranon.2016.07.005
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2016.07.005
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000026083
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000007474
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access