dc.contributor.author
Davies, Gail F.
dc.contributor.author
Greenhough, Beth J.
dc.contributor.author
Hobson-West, Pru
dc.contributor.author
Kirk, Robert G. W.
dc.contributor.author
Applebee, Ken
dc.contributor.author
Bellingan, Laura C.
dc.contributor.author
Berdoy, Manuel
dc.contributor.author
Buller, Henry
dc.contributor.author
Cassaday, Helen J.
dc.contributor.author
Davies, Keith
dc.contributor.author
Diefenbacher, Daniela
dc.contributor.author
Druglitro, Tone
dc.contributor.author
Escobar, Maria Paula
dc.contributor.author
Friese, Carrie
dc.contributor.author
Herrmann, Kathrin
dc.contributor.author
Hinterberger, Amy
dc.contributor.author
Jarrett, Wendy J.
dc.contributor.author
Jayne, Kimberley
dc.contributor.author
Johnson, Adam M.
dc.contributor.author
Johnson, Elizabeth R.
dc.contributor.author
Konold, Timm
dc.contributor.author
Leach, Matthew C.
dc.contributor.author
Leonelli, Sabina
dc.contributor.author
Lewis, David I.
dc.contributor.author
Lilley, Elliot J.
dc.contributor.author
Longridge, Emma R.
dc.contributor.author
McLeod, Carmen M.
dc.contributor.author
Ormandy, Elisabeth H.
dc.contributor.author
Pallett, Helen
dc.contributor.author
Poort, Lonneke
dc.contributor.author
Pound, Pandora
dc.contributor.author
Ramsden, Edmund
dc.contributor.author
Roe, Emma
dc.contributor.author
Scalway, Helen
dc.contributor.author
Schrader, Astrid
dc.contributor.author
Scotton, Chris J.
dc.contributor.author
Scudamore, Cheryl L.
dc.contributor.author
Smith, Jane A.
dc.contributor.author
Whitfield, Lucy
dc.contributor.author
Wolfensohn, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T10:25:18Z
dc.date.available
2016-09-19T11:24:49.643Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20400
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-23703
dc.description.abstract
Improving laboratory animal science and welfare requires both new scientific
research and insights from research in the humanities and social sciences.
Whilst scientific research provides evidence to replace, reduce and refine
procedures involving laboratory animals (the ‘3Rs’), work in the humanities
and social sciences can help understand the social, economic and cultural
processes that enhance or impede humane ways of knowing and working with
laboratory animals. However, communication across these disciplinary
perspectives is currently limited, and they design research programmes,
generate results, engage users, and seek to influence policy in different
ways. To facilitate dialogue and future research at this interface, we
convened an interdisciplinary group of 45 life scientists, social scientists,
humanities scholars, non-governmental organisations and policy-makers to
generate a collaborative research agenda. This drew on methods employed by
other agenda-setting exercises in science policy, using a collaborative and
deliberative approach for the identification of research priorities.
Participants were recruited from across the community, invited to submit
research questions and vote on their priorities. They then met at an
interactive workshop in the UK, discussed all 136 questions submitted, and
collectively defined the 30 most important issues for the group. The output is
a collaborative future agenda for research in the humanities and social
sciences on laboratory animal science and welfare. The questions indicate a
demand for new research in the humanities and social sciences to inform
emerging discussions and priorities on the governance and practice of
laboratory animal research, including on issues around: international
harmonisation, openness and public engagement, ‘cultures of care’, harm-
benefit analysis and the future of the 3Rs. The process outlined below
underlines the value of interdisciplinary exchange for improving communication
across different research cultures and identifies ways of enhancing the
effectiveness of future research at the interface between the humanities,
social sciences, science and science policy.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
dc.title
Developing a Collaborative Agenda for Humanities and Social Scientific
Research on Laboratory Animal Science and Welfare
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
PLoS ONE. - 11 (2016), 7, Artikel Nr. e0158791
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pone.0158791
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158791
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000025389
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000006977
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access