dc.contributor.author
Rillig, Matthias C.
dc.contributor.author
Ingraffia, Rosolino
dc.contributor.author
Machado, Anderson A. de Souza
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T10:20:26Z
dc.date.available
2018-01-18T15:22:09.852Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20270
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-23574
dc.description.abstract
Background: We live in a plastic age (Thompson et al., 2009), with
microplastic (typically defined as plastic particles < 5 mm) becoming an
increasingly appreciated aspect of environmental pollution. Research has been
overwhelmingly focused on aquatic systems, especially the oceans, but there is
a current shift to more strongly consider terrestrial ecosystems (Rillig,
2012; Horton et al., 2017). In particular agroecosystems are coming into focus
as a major entry point for microplastics in continental systems (Nizzetto et
al., 2016b), where contamination might occur via different sources as sludge
amendment or plastic mulching (Steinmetz et al., 2016). Given the central role
of agroecosystems, including their soil biodiversity (Rillig et al., 2016), in
food production, such numbers are potential cause for concern. Field data on
measured microplastic presence in agricultural soils are still not widely
available, but nevertheless this material is certain to arrive at the soil
surface. The fate of material deposited at the soil surface is not clear:
particles may be removed by wind or water erosion, becoming airborne, or may
be lost by surface runoff (Nizzetto et al., 2016a). Nevertheless, a
substantial part of the microplastic (or nanoplastic following further
disintegration) is expected to enter the soil. The degree of hazard
represented by microplastic to various soil biota is not clear. Direct
evidence comes from experimental work on earthworms, on which microbeads had
negative effects (Huerta Lwanga et al., 2016; also reviewed in Horton et al.,
2017). Data on impacts on other soil biota groups are not available. However,
Kiyama et al. (2012) have shown that polystyrene beads can be taken up by the
nematode Caenorhabditis elegans; this means the material could also accumulate
in the soil food web (Rillig, 2012). Movement into soil is an important aspect
of assessing risk: will soil biota be exposed to microplastics? Here, we
sketch what is known about movement of such particles in soil, which players
and factors could influence this, and we chart avenues for research aimed at
the movement and distribution of microplastic in agricultural soils.
en
dc.format.extent
4 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
soil aggregation
dc.subject
contaminant transport
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::580 Pflanzen (Botanik)
dc.title
Microplastic incorporation into soil in agroecosystems
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
Front. Plant Sci. - 8 (2017), Artikel Nr. 1805
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3389/fpls.2017.01805
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01805
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Biologie
refubium.funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000028597
refubium.note.author
Gefördert durch die DFG und den Open-Access-Publikationsfond der Freien
Univeristät Berlin.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000009202
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access