dc.contributor.author
Rabold, Denise
dc.contributor.author
Espelage, Werner
dc.contributor.author
Abu Sin, Muna
dc.contributor.author
Eckmanns, Tim
dc.contributor.author
Schneeberg, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Neubauer, Heinrich
dc.contributor.author
Möbius, Nadine
dc.contributor.author
Hille, Katja
dc.contributor.author
Wieler, Lothar H.
dc.contributor.author
Seyboldt, Christian
dc.contributor.author
Lübke-Becker, Antina
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T10:20:09Z
dc.date.available
2018-03-16T08:59:53.770Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20262
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-23566
dc.description.abstract
Background: Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) in humans range from
asymptomatic carriage to life-threatening intestinal disease. Findings on C.
difficile in various animal species and an overlap in ribotypes (RTs) suggest
potential zoonotic transmission. However, the impact of animals for human CDI
remains unclear. Methods: In a large-scale survey we collected 1,447 fecal
samples to determine the occurrence of C. difficile in small companion animals
(dogs and cats) and their owners and to assess potential epidemiological links
within the community. The Germany-wide survey was conducted from July
2012-August 2013. PCR ribotyping, Multilocus VNTR Analysis (MLVA) and PCR
detection of toxin genes were used to characterize isolated C. difficile
strains. A database was defined and logistic regression used to identify
putative factors associated with fecal shedding of C. difficile. Results: In
total, 1,418 samples met the inclusion criteria. The isolation rates for small
companion animals and their owners within the community were similarly low
with 3.0% (25/840) and 2.9% (17/578), respectively. PCR ribotyping revealed
eight and twelve different RTs in animals and humans, respectively, whereas
three RTs were isolated in both, humans and animals. RT 014/0, a well-known
human hospital-associated lineage, was predominantly detected in animal
samples. Moreover, the potentially highly pathogenic RTs 027 and 078 were
isolated from dogs. Even though, C. difficile did not occur simultaneously in
animals and humans sharing the same household. The results of the
epidemiological analysis of factors associated with fecal shedding of C.
difficile support the hypothesis of a zoonotic potential. Conclusions:
Molecular characterization and epidemiological analysis revealed that the
zoonotic risk for C. difficile associated with dogs and cats within the
community is low but cannot be excluded.
en
dc.format.extent
12 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Clostridium difficile infection
dc.subject
small companion animal
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::616 Krankheiten
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::630 Landwirtschaft::636 Viehwirtschaft
dc.title
The zoonotic potential of Clostridium difficile from small companion animals
and their owners
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
PLoS ONE 13 (2018), 2, e0193411
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pone.0193411
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193411
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Mikrobiologie und Tierseuchen
refubium.funding
Institutional Participation
refubium.funding.id
PLOSOne
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000029339
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000009542
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access