dc.contributor.author
Beck, Marcus
dc.contributor.author
Ghadjar, Pirus
dc.contributor.author
Weihrauch, Mirko
dc.contributor.author
Burock, Susen
dc.contributor.author
Budach, Volker
dc.contributor.author
Nadobny, Jacek
dc.contributor.author
Sehouli, Jalid
dc.contributor.author
Wust, Peter
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T04:09:29Z
dc.date.available
2015-08-31T08:49:31.316Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/16692
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-20873
dc.description.abstract
Background Peritoneal carcinomatosis occurs in different cancer subtypes and
is associated with a dismal prognosis. Some doubts remain whether the whole
abdomen can be treated by regional hyperthermia, therefore we analyzed
feasibility conducting a pilot study. Methods A simulation of the
abdominopelvic heat distribution in 11 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis
was done using the HyperPlan software and the SIGMA-60 and SIGMA-Eye
applicators. Tissue-specific region-related electrical and thermal parameters
were used to solve the Maxwell’s equations and the bioheat-transfer equation.
Three-dimensional specific absorption rate (SAR) distributions and,
additionally, estimated region-related perfusion rates were used to solve the
bioheat-transfer equation. The predicted SAR and temperature distributions
were compared with minimally invasive measurements in pelvic reference points.
Results In 11 patients (7 of them treated in the SIGMA-60 and 4 in the SIGMA-
Eye applicator) the measured treatment variables (SAR, temperatures in the
pelvic reference points) indicated that the heated volumes were higher for the
SIGMA-Eye applicator. The mean computed abdominal SARs were less for the
SIGMA-Eye (33 versus 44 W/kg). Nevertheless, the temperature distributions in
the abdomen (peritoneal cavity) were more homogeneous in the SIGMA-Eye
applicator as compared to the SIGMA-60 as indicated by higher values of T 90
(mean 40.2 versus 38.2 °C) and T 50 (mean 41.1 versus 40.2 °C), while the
maximum temperatures were similar (in the range 41 to 43 °C). Even though the
mean abdominal SAR was lower in the SIGMA-Eye, the heat distribution covered a
larger volume of the abdomen (in particular the upper abdomen). For the
SIGMA-60 applicator the achieved T 90 appeared to be limited between 41 and 42
°C, for the SIGMA Eye applicator more effective T 90 in the range 42 to 43 °C
were obtained. Conclusion Our results suggest that an adequate heating of the
abdomen and therefore abdominal regional hyperthermia in PC patients appears
feasible. The SIGMA-Eye applicator appears to be superior compared to the
SIGMA-60 applicator for abdominal hyperthermia.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Peritoneal carcinosis
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Regional hyperthermia of the abdomen, a pilot study towards the treatment of
peritoneal carcinomatosis
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
Radiation Oncology. - 10 (2015), 1, Artikel Nr. 157
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s13014-015-0451-3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://www.ro-journal.com/content/10/1/157
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000023004
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000005331
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access