dc.contributor.author
Lee, Vivian Wing-Yan
dc.contributor.author
Tsai, Ronald Bing-Ching
dc.contributor.author
Chow, Ines Hang-Iao
dc.contributor.author
Yan, Bryan Ping-Yen
dc.contributor.author
Kaya, Mehmet Gungor
dc.contributor.author
Park, Jai-Wun
dc.contributor.author
Lam, Yat-Yin
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T04:04:46Z
dc.date.available
2016-10-18T08:26:54.679Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/16542
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-20723
dc.description.abstract
Background Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a promising
therapy for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) but
its cost-effectiveness remains understudied. This study evaluated the cost-
effectiveness of LAAO for stroke prophylaxis in NVAF. Methods A Markov
decision analytic model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness of LAAO
with 7 pharmacological strategies: aspirin alone, clopidogrel plus aspirin,
warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, apixaban, and rivaroxaban.
Outcome measures included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs
and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Base-case data were derived
from ACTIVE, RE-LY, ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF, PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL trials. One-
way sensitivity analysis varied by CHADS2 score, HAS-BLED score, time
horizons, and LAAO costs; and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 10,000
Monte Carlo simulations was conducted to assess parameter uncertainty. Results
LAAO was considered cost-effective compared with aspirin, clopidogrel plus
aspirin, and warfarin, with ICER of US$5,115, $2,447, and $6,298 per QALY
gained, respectively. LAAO was dominant (i.e. less costly but more effective)
compared to other strategies. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated favorable
ICERs of LAAO against other strategies in varied CHADS2 score, HAS-BLED score,
time horizons (5 to 15 years) and LAAO costs. LAAO was cost-effective in 86.24
% of 10,000 simulations using a threshold of US$50,000/QALY. Conclusions
Transcatheter LAAO is cost-effective for prevention of stroke in NVAF compared
with 7 pharmacological strategies. Condensed abstract The transcatheter left
atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is considered cost-effective against the
standard 7 oral pharmacological strategies including acetylsalicylic acid
(ASA) alone, clopidogrel plus ASA, warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150
mg, apixaban, and rivaroxaban for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial
fibrillation management.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Atrial fibrillation
dc.subject
Cost-effectiveness
dc.subject
Left atrial appendage occlusion
dc.subject
Stroke prevention
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::615 Pharmakologie, Therapeutik
dc.title
Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with
pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. - 16 (2016), Artikel Nr. 167
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s12872-016-0351-y
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://bmccardiovascdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12872-016-0351-y
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000025556
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000007218
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access