dc.contributor.author
Brueggenjuergen, B.
dc.contributor.author
Baker, T.
dc.contributor.author
Bhogal, R.
dc.contributor.author
Ahmed, F.
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T03:58:19Z
dc.date.available
2016-09-16T11:33:53.493Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/16307
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-20490
dc.description.abstract
Background Chronic migraine (CM) is a neurological disorder associated with
substantial disability. Botulinum toxin type A (Botox) is an approved and
effective preventive treatment option for adult patients with CM. Transcranial
magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an alternative treatment device delivering a
brief pre-set magnetic pulse used for self-administration by the patient at
home. Despite being available in a risk share scheme TMS is perceived to be
more costly in the UK. The objective of this study was to analyse the
incremental costs of TMS compared to Botox in refractory CM patients both for
a UK individual funding request setting as well as for an average UK
specialist center setting. Methods Cost impact results were derived from a
decision-tree model simulating treatment pathways over 1 year. Costs were
applied from the most recently available UK data sources. Sensitivity analysis
was performed for all variables. Results Based on published utilisation data
45.5 % of CM patients would continuously receive Botox over 1 year, whereas
53.7 % of TMS patients would be still on treatment at the end of year one.
Total costs of Botox treatment accrue to £2923 in an individual funding
request NHS cost setting, whereas TMS treatment results in £1466 in the first
year. Applying a time-based NHS cost setting expenditures accrue to £1747 for
the Botox treatment and to £1361 for the TMS treatment. In both cost settings
variation of cost assumptions did have a minor impact on the cost increment
from Botox to TMS. Conclusion The current risk share based remuneration model
of TMS allows the UK NHS to reimburse only the cost of those patients
experiencing reduction in migraine days resulting in lower costs for treating
migraine attacks. Treatment of chronic refractory migraine using TMS implies a
substantial cost reduction potential for the management of chronic treatment
of refractory migraine patients compared to conventional Botox treatment.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Chronic migraine
dc.subject
Economic analysis
dc.subject
Incremental costs
dc.subject
Pay for performance
dc.subject
Self-administration
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Cost impact of a non-invasive, portable device for patient self-administration
of chronic migraine in a UK National Health Service setting
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
Springer Plus. - 5 (2016), Artikel Nr. 1249
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s40064-016-2924-8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://springerplus.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40064-016-2924-8
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000025375
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000006965
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access