dc.contributor.author
Puder, Lia C.
dc.contributor.author
Fischer, Hendrik S.
dc.contributor.author
Wilitzki, Silke
dc.contributor.author
Usemann, Jakob
dc.contributor.author
Godfrey, Simon
dc.contributor.author
Schmalisch, Gerd
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T03:50:57Z
dc.date.available
2014-12-15T12:57:05.459Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/16065
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-20250
dc.description.abstract
Background Several respiratory diseases are associated with specific
respiratory sounds. In contrast to auscultation, computerized lung sound
analysis is objective and can be performed continuously over an extended
period. Moreover, audio recordings can be stored. Computerized lung sounds
have rarely been assessed in neonates during the first year of life. This
study was designed to determine and validate optimal cut-off values for
computerized wheeze detection, based on the assessment by trained clinicians
of stored records of lung sounds, in infants aged <1 year. Methods Lung sounds
in 120 sleeping infants, of median (interquartile range) postmenstrual age of
51 (44.5–67.5) weeks, were recorded on 144 test occasions by an automatic
wheeze detection device (PulmoTrack®). The records were retrospectively
evaluated by three trained clinicians blinded to the results. Optimal cut-off
values for the automatically determined relative durations of inspiratory and
expiratory wheezing were determined by receiver operating curve analysis, and
sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results The optimal cut-off
values for the automatically detected durations of inspiratory and expiratory
wheezing were 2% and 3%, respectively. These cutoffs had a sensitivity and
specificity of 85.7% and 80.7%, respectively, for inspiratory wheezing and
84.6% and 82.5%, respectively, for expiratory wheezing. Inter-observer
reliability among the experts was moderate, with a Fleiss’ Kappa (95%
confidence interval) of 0.59 (0.57-0.62) for inspiratory and 0.54 (0.52 -
0.57) for expiratory wheezing. Conclusion Computerized wheeze detection is
feasible during the first year of life. This method is more objective and can
be more readily standardized than subjective auscultation, providing
quantitative and noninvasive information about the extent of wheezing.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Validation of computerized wheeze detection in young infants during the first
months of life
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
BMC Pediatrics. - 14 (2014), 1, Artikel Nr. 257
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/1471-2431-14-257
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-257
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000021464
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000004278
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access