dc.contributor.author
Howe, Jan Niklas
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T03:47:43Z
dc.date.available
2013-07-05
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/15950
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-20136
dc.description.abstract
The conference paper interprets Spinoza‟s concept of “sola scriptura” as a
reductio ad absurdum of historical-critical approaches to text interpretation.
It shows that despite Spi-noza‟s emphasis on the revelatory function of
scripture and despite his claim that there is only one method of reading it,
he intently and distinctly undermines this very hermeneutics as unre-liable
and incompatible with both reason and truth. The text follows the central
intuition that for Spinoza, this insuffiency of hermeneutics accounts for its
political potential, as a means of uncoupling politics and theology.
de
dc.format.extent
S. [195]-209
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/
dc.subject.ddc
800 Literatur::800 Literatur, Rhetorik, Literaturwissenschaft
dc.subject.ddc
800 Literatur::800 Literatur, Rhetorik, Literaturwissenschaft::809 Geschichte, Darstellung, Literaturwissenschaft und- kritik
dc.title
"Gott ist Feuer" und "Gott ist eifervoll" : Spinozas Sola Scriptura
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
Jens Elze ... (Hg.): Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Philologie. GiNDok –
Publikationsplattform Germanistik 2011
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/22907
refubium.affiliation
Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Peter Szondi-Institut für Allgemeine und Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000018038
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000002623
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
