dc.contributor.author
Müller, Kristin
dc.contributor.author
Blum, Nicole, M.
dc.contributor.author
Kluge, Holger
dc.contributor.author
Bauerfeind, Rolf
dc.contributor.author
Fröhlich, Julia
dc.contributor.author
Mader, Anneluise
dc.contributor.author
Wendler, Karola R.
dc.contributor.author
Müller, Andreas S.
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T03:38:36Z
dc.date.available
2014-02-18T19:08:57.675Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/15617
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-19805
dc.description.abstract
Objective: Since the ban of antibiotics as growth promoting feed additives in
the EU in 2006 research in alternatives has gained importance. Phytogenic feed
additives represent a heterogenous class of different plant derived substances
that are discussed to improve the health of farm animals by direct and
indirect antioxidant effects and by influencing microbial eubiosis in the
gastrointestinal tract. Consequently our study aimed to investigate the
influence of broccoli extract and the essential oils of tur- meric, oregano,
thyme and rosemary, as selected individual additives, on intestinal and faecal
microflora, on xenobiotic enzymes, and on the antioxidant system of piglets.
Methods: 48 four weeks old male weaned piglets were assigned to 6 groups of 8.
The piglets were housed individually in stainless steel pens with slatted
floor. The control group (Con) was fed a diet without an additive for 4 weeks.
The diet of group BE contained 0.15 g/kg sulforaphane in form of a broccoli
extract. 535, 282, 373 and 476 mg/kg of the essential oils of turmeric (Cuo),
oregano (Oo), thyme (To) and rosemary (Ro) were added to the diets of the
remaining 4 groups to stan-dardise supplementation to 150 mg/kg of the oils’
key terpene compounds ar-turmerone, carvacrol, thymol and 1,8-cineole. The
composition of bacterial microflora was examined by cultivating samples of
jejeunal and colonic mucosa and of faeces under specific conditions. The mRNA
expression of xenobiotic and antioxidant enzymes was determined by reversing
transcrip- tase real time detection PCR (RT-PCR). Total antioxidant status was
assayed using the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC), and lipid
peroxidation was determined by measuring thiobarbioturic acid reactive
substances (TBA- RS). Results: Compared to Con piglets all additives
positively influenced weight gain and feed conversion in week 1. Over the
whole trial period no significant differences in performance parameters
existed between the experimental groups. Compared to group Con performance of
Ro piglets was, however, slightly impaired. Com- pared to Con piglets Cuo, Oo
and To increased the ratio of Lactobacilli:E. coli attached to the jejunal
mucosa, whereas BE and Ro impaired this ratio slightly. In contrast in colonic
mucosa Ro improved Lactobacilli:E. coli ratio. In faecal samples an
improvement of Lactobacilli:E. coli ratio could be analysed for To and Ro. Ro
was the only additive that reduced the incidence rate of piglets tested
positive for enterotoxic E. coli (ETEC). All additives significantly increased
jejunal TEAC and reduced TBA-RS. In the liver BE, Cuo, Oo and To increased
TEAC in tendency and Ro significantly. Liver TBA-RS were slightly reduced by
all additives compared to Con piglets. Whereas the influence of BE, To and Ro
on jejunal TEAC mainly was derived from the induction of xenobiotic and
antioxidant enzymes (indirect antioxidant effects), Cuo and Oo influenced TEAC
by direct antioxidant effects. Discussion and Conclusions: Our results have
shown: That within the labiatae oils Oo and To have the potential to improve
performance slightly. That phytogenic substances have a small but not sig-
nificant influence on intestinal microflora. That phytogenic feed additives
up-regulate the anti- oxidant system of piglets either by direct or by
indirect antioxidant effects and that they may thereby improve health status.
That within the labiatae oils Oo has a high direct antioxidant potential
whereas Ro potently induces xenobiotic and antioxidant enzymes. That broccoli
extract is an attractive new phytogenic additive, improving antioxidant status
by indirect antioxidant effects. That defined combinations of selected
phytogenic substances may produce additive effects. That health promoting
effects of phytogenic additives in the future should be studied systematically
under the challenge with pathogenic microorganisms or food derived to-xins.
de
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::630 Landwirtschaft
dc.title
Effects of broccoli extract and various essential oils on intestinal and
faecal microflora and on xenobiotic enzymes and the antioxidant system of
piglets
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
Open Journal of Animal Sciences. - 2 (2012), 2, S.78-98
dc.identifier.sepid
21099
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.4236/ojas.2012.22012
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2012.22012
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Tierernährung
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000019638
refubium.note.author
Dieser Artikel wurde in einer Open-AccessZeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000003060
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
2161-7597