dc.contributor.author
Ulm, Lena
dc.contributor.author
Wohlrapp, Dorota
dc.contributor.author
Meinzer, Marcus
dc.contributor.author
Steinicke, Robert
dc.contributor.author
Schatz, Alexej
dc.contributor.author
Denzler, Petra
dc.contributor.author
Klehmet, Juliane
dc.contributor.author
Dohle, Christian
dc.contributor.author
Niedeggen, Michael
dc.contributor.author
Meisel, Andreas
dc.contributor.author
Winter, York
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T03:37:12Z
dc.date.available
2015-11-09T06:27:39.701Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/15577
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-19765
dc.description.abstract
Abstract Current assessment of visual neglect involves paper-and-pencil tests
or computer-based tasks. Both have been criticised because of their lack of
ecological validity as target stimuli can only be presented in a restricted
visual range. This study examined the user-friendliness and diagnostic
strength of a new “Circle-Monitor” (CM), which enlarges the range of the
peripersonal space, in comparison to a standard paper-and-pencil test
(Neglect-Test, NET). Methods Ten stroke patients with neglect and ten age-
matched healthy controls were examined by the NET and the CM test comprising
of four subtests (Star Cancellation, Line Bisection, Dice Task, and Puzzle
Test). Results The acceptance of the CM in elderly controls and neglect
patients was high. Participants rated the examination by CM as clear, safe and
more enjoyable than NET. Healthy controls performed at ceiling on all
subtests, without any systematic differences between the visual fields. Both
NET and CM revealed significant differences between controls and patients in
Line Bisection, Star Cancellation and visuo-constructive tasks (NET: Figure
Copying, CM: Puzzle Test). Discriminant analyses revealed cross-validated
assignment of patients and controls to groups was more precise when based on
the CM (hit rate 90%) as compared to the NET (hit rate 70%). Conclusion The CM
proved to be a sensitive novel tool to diagnose visual neglect symptoms
quickly and accurately with superior diagnostic validity compared to a
standard neglect test while being well accepted by patients. Due to its
upgradable functions the system may also be a valuable tool not only to test
for non-visual neglect symptoms, but also to provide treatment and assess its
outcome.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
A Circle-Monitor for Computerised Assessment of Visual Neglect in Peripersonal
Space
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
PLoS ONE. - 8 (2013), 12, Artikel Nr. e82892
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pone.0082892
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082892
refubium.affiliation
Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000023437
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer Open-Access-Zeitschrift pubilziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000005646
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access