dc.contributor.author
Duwal, Sulav
dc.contributor.author
Schütte, Christof
dc.contributor.author
Kleist, Max von
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T03:22:36Z
dc.date.available
2015-09-22T06:17:03.818Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/15049
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-19237
dc.description.abstract
Antiviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) through daily drug administration
can protect healthy individuals from HIV-1 infection. While PrEP was recently
approved by the FDA, the potential long-term consequences of PrEP
implementation remain entirely unclear. The aim of this study is to predict
the efficacy of different prophylactic strategies with the pro-drug tenofovir-
disoproxil-fumarate (TDF) and to assess the sensitivity towards timing- and
mode of TDF administration (daily- vs. single dose), adherence and the number
of transmitted viruses. We developed a pharmacokinetic model for TDF and its
active anabolite tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) and validated it with data
from 4 different trials, including 4 distinct dosing regimes. Pharmacokinetics
were coupled to an HIV model and viral decay following TDF mono-therapy was
predicted, consistent with available data. Subsequently, a stochastic approach
was used to estimate the % infections prevented by (i) daily TDF-based PrEP,
(ii) one week TDF started either shortly before, or -after viral exposure and
(iii) a single dose oral TDF before viral challenge (sd-PrEP). Analytical
solutions were derived to assess the relation between intracellular TFV-DP
concentrations and prophylactic efficacy. The predicted efficacy of TDF was
limited by a slow accumulation of active compound (TFV-DP) and variable TFV-DP
half-life and decreased with increasing numbers of transmitted viruses. Once
daily TDF-based PrEP yielded 80% protection, if at least 40% of pills were
taken. Sd-PrEP with 300 mg or 600 mg TDF could prevent 50% infections, when
given at least before virus exposure. The efficacy dropped to 10%, when given
1 h before 24 h exposure. Efficacy could not be increased with increasing
dosage or prolonged administration. Post-exposure prophylaxis poorly prevented
infection. The use of drugs that accumulate more rapidly, or local application
of tenofovir gel may overcome the need for drug administration long before
virus exposure.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::510 Mathematik
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::616 Krankheiten
dc.title
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor
Tenofovir and Prophylactic Efficacy against HIV-1 Infection
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
PLoS ONE. - 7 (2012), 7, Artikel Nr. e40382
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pone.0040382
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0040382
refubium.affiliation
Mathematik und Informatik
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000023137
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000005417
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access