dc.contributor.author
Lüdtke, Jana
dc.contributor.author
Jacobs, Arthur M.
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T03:16:26Z
dc.date.available
2016-01-13T12:23:19.802Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/14820
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-19009
dc.description.abstract
The vast majority of studies on affective processes in reading focus on single
words. The most robust finding is a processing advantage for positively
valenced words, which has been replicated in the rare studies investigating
effects of affective features of words during sentence or story comprehension.
Here we were interested in how the different valences of words in a sentence
influence its processing and supralexical affective evaluation. Using a
sentence verification task we investigated how comprehension of simple
declarative sentences containing a noun and an adjective depends on the
valences of both words. The results are in line with the assumed general
processing advantage for positive words. We also observed a clear interaction
effect, as can be expected from the affective priming literature: sentences
with emotionally congruent words (e.g., The grandpa is clever) were verified
faster than sentences containing emotionally incongruent words (e.g., The
grandpa is lonely). The priming effect was most prominent for sentences with
positive words suggesting that both, early processing as well as later meaning
integration and situation model construction, is modulated by affective
processing. In a second rating task we investigated how the emotion potential
of supralexical units depends on word valence. The simplest hypothesis
predicts that the supralexical affective structure is a linear combination of
the valences of the nouns and adjectives (Bestgen, 1994). Overall, our results
do not support this: The observed clear interaction effect on ratings indicate
that especially negative adjectives dominated supralexical evaluation, i.e., a
sort of negativity bias in sentence evaluation. Future models of sentence
processing thus should take interactive affective effects into account.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
sentence comprehension
dc.subject
affective sentence structure
dc.subject
emotional valence
dc.subject
supralexical evaluation
dc.subject
neurocognitive poetics model
dc.subject
affective congruency effect
dc.subject
sentence verification
dc.subject
situation model building
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::150 Psychologie
dc.title
The emotion potential of simple sentences
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
Front. Psychol. - 6 (2015), Artikel Nr. 1137
dc.title.subtitle
additive or interactive effects of nouns and adjectives?
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01137
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01137/abstract
refubium.affiliation
Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie
de
refubium.funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000023520
refubium.note.author
Gefördert durch die DFG und den Open Access Publikationsfonds der Freien
Universität Berlin.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000005706
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access