dc.contributor.author
Koops, Kathelijne
dc.contributor.author
Schöning, Caspar
dc.contributor.author
Isaji, Mina
dc.contributor.author
Hashimoto, Chie
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T03:14:27Z
dc.date.available
2015-08-27T08:24:49.024Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/14763
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-18953
dc.description.abstract
Cultural variation has been identified in a growing number of animal species
ranging from primates to cetaceans. The principal method used to establish the
presence of culture in wild populations is the method of exclusion. This
method is problematic, since it cannot rule out the influence of genetics and
ecology in geographically distant populations. A new approach to the study of
culture compares neighbouring groups belonging to the same population. We
applied this new approach by comparing ant-dipping tool length between two
neighbouring communities of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in
the Kalinzu Forest, Uganda. Ant-dipping tool length varies across chimpanzee
study sites in relation to army ant species (Dorylus spp.) and dipping
location (nest vs. trail). We compared the availability of army ant species
and dipping tool length between the two communities. M-group tools were
significantly longer than S-group tools, despite identical army ant target
species availabilities. Moreover, tool length in S-group was shorter than at
all other sites where chimpanzees prey on epigaeic ants at nests. Considering
the lack of ecological differences between the two communities, the tool
length difference appears to be cultural. Our findings highlight how cultural
knowledge can generate small-scale cultural diversification in neighbouring
chimpanzee communities.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
dc.title
Cultural differences in ant-dipping tool length between neighbouring
chimpanzee communities at Kalinzu, Uganda
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
Scientific Reports. - 5 (2015), Artikel Nr. 12456
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1038/srep12456
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://www.nature.com/articles/srep12456
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000022981
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000005314
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access