dc.contributor.author
Weymann, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Radovits, Tamás
dc.contributor.author
Schmack, Bastian
dc.contributor.author
Korkmaz, Sevil
dc.contributor.author
Li, Shiliang
dc.contributor.author
Chaimow, Nicole
dc.contributor.author
Pätzold, Ines
dc.contributor.author
Becher, Peter Moritz
dc.contributor.author
Hartyánszky, István
dc.contributor.author
Soós, Pál
dc.contributor.author
Merkely, Gergo
dc.contributor.author
Németh, Balázs Tamás
dc.contributor.author
Istók, Roland
dc.contributor.author
Veres, Gábor
dc.contributor.author
Merkely, Béla
dc.contributor.author
Terytze, Konstantin
dc.contributor.author
Karck, Matthias
dc.contributor.author
Szabó, Gábor
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T03:10:13Z
dc.date.available
2014-09-17T09:03:57.681Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/14610
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-18802
dc.description.abstract
Background To date, no experimental or clinical study provides detailed
analysis of vascular impedance changes after total aortic arch replacement.
This study investigated ventriculoarterial coupling and vascular impedance
after replacement of the aortic arch with conventional prostheses vs.
decellularized allografts. Methods After preparing decellularized aortic arch
allografts, their mechanical, histological and biochemical properties were
evaluated and compared to native aortic arches and conventional prostheses in
vitro. In open-chest dogs, total aortic arch replacement was performed with
conventional prostheses and compared to decellularized allografts (n =
5/group). Aortic flow and pressure were recorded continuously, left
ventricular pressure-volume relations were measured by using a pressure-
conductance catheter. From the hemodynamic variables end-systolic elastance
(Ees), arterial elastance (Ea) and ventriculoarterial coupling were
calculated. Characteristic impedance (Z) was assessed by Fourier analysis.
Results While Ees did not differ between the groups and over time (4.1±1.19
vs. 4.58±1.39 mmHg/mL and 3.21±0.97 vs. 3.96±1.16 mmHg/mL), Ea showed a higher
increase in the prosthesis group (4.01±0.67 vs. 6.18±0.20 mmHg/mL, P<0.05) in
comparison to decellularized allografts (5.03±0.35 vs. 5.99±1.09 mmHg/mL).
This led to impaired ventriculoarterial coupling in the prosthesis group,
while it remained unchanged in the allograft group (62.5±50.9 vs. 3.9±23.4%).
Z showed a strong increasing tendency in the prosthesis group and it was
markedly higher after replacement when compared to decellularized allografts
(44.6±8.3dyn·sec·cm−5 vs. 32.4±2.0dyn·sec·cm−5, P<0.05). Conclusions Total
aortic arch replacement leads to contractility-afterload mismatch by means of
increased impedance and invert ventriculoarterial coupling ratio after
implantation of conventional prostheses. Implantation of decellularized
allografts preserves vascular impedance thereby improving ventriculoarterial
mechanoenergetics after aortic arch replacement.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Total Aortic Arch Replacement
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
PLoS ONE. - 9 (2014), 7, Artikel Nr. e103588
dc.title.subtitle
Superior Ventriculo-Arterial Coupling with Decellularized Allografts Compared
with Conventional Prostheses
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pone.0103588
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0103588
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000020975
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000003921
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access