dc.contributor.author
Rüder, Constantin
dc.contributor.author
Haase, Tobias
dc.contributor.author
Krost, Annalena
dc.contributor.author
Langwieser, Nicole
dc.contributor.author
Peter, Jan
dc.contributor.author
Kamann, Stefanie
dc.contributor.author
Zohlnhöfer, Dietlind
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T02:59:17Z
dc.date.available
2014-11-24T14:33:08.269Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/14271
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-18466
dc.description.abstract
Aims Several studies suggest that circulating bone marrow derived stem cells
promote the regeneration of ischemic tissues. For hematopoietic stem cell
transplantation combinatorial granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
(G-CSF)/Plerixafor (AMD3100) administration was shown to enhance mobilization
of bone marrow derived stem cells compared to G-CSF monotherapy. Here we
tested the hypothesis whether combinatorial G-CSF/AMD3100 therapy has
beneficial effects in cardiac recovery in a mouse model of myocardial
infarction. Methods We analyzed the effect of single G-CSF (250 µg/kg/day) and
combinatorial G-CSF/AMD3100 (100 µg/kg/day) treatment on cardiac morphology,
vascularization, and hemodynamics 28 days after permanent ligation of the left
anterior descending artery (LAD). G-CSF treatment started directly after
induction of myocardial infarction (MI) for 3 consecutive days followed by a
single AMD3100 application on day three after MI in the G-CSF/AMD3100 group.
Cell mobilization was assessed by flow cytometry of blood samples drawn from
tail vein on day 0, 7, and 14. Results Peripheral blood analysis 7 days after
MI showed enhanced mobilization of white blood cells (WBC) and endothelial
progenitor cells (EPC) upon G-CSF and combinatorial G-CSF/AMD3100 treatment.
However, single or combinatorial treatment showed no improvement in survival,
left ventricular function, and infarction size compared to the saline treated
control group 28 days after MI. Furthermore, no differences in histology and
vascularization of infarcted hearts could be observed. Conclusion Although the
implemented treatment regimen caused no adverse effects, our data show that
combinatorial G-CSF/AMD therapy does not promote myocardial regeneration after
permanent LAD occlusion.
de
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Combinatorial G-CSF/AMD3100 Treatment in Cardiac Repair after Myocardial
Infarction
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
PLoS ONE. - 9 (2014), 8, Artikel Nr. e104644
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pone.0104644
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0104644
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000021034
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000003965
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access