dc.contributor.author
Specker, Marcus
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-07T23:36:36Z
dc.date.available
2000-12-14T00:00:00.649Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/10708
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-14906
dc.description
Die komplette Dissertation im pdf-Format (462.229 Bytes):
speck.pdf
dc.description.abstract
Due to related diseases the consumption of raw milk has recently been called
into question. On the one hand there are many reports in the literature about
milk-borne enteritis associated with raw milk and dairy-products manufactured
from raw milk whereas heat-treated milk and dairy-products are seldom the
cause for infection and intoxication. On the other hand there is a demand for
natural, untreated foods on the the part of the consumer.
The intention of this investigation was to examine the occurrence of certain
human pathogens in raw milk from Brandenburg (Germany). Beside the total
bacterial count and the coliform count as parameters of hygiene the presence
of Listeria species, especially Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella species,
Campylobacter species and Staphylococcus aureus was tested.
The investigation was carried out according to the Official Methods-Collection
of § 35 of the German Foods and Foodstuffs Article (LMBG) which have in part
been slightly changed. The research on Campylobacter was done according to the
methods suggested by the Nordic Comitee on Food Analysis to the European
Committee for Standardization (CEN).
The research was done between June 1993 and July 1994 with 415 raw milk
samples altogether taken by the dairy for their own tests from farm bulk-tanks
of 82 dairy farms being investigated. The milk was then delivered to the dairy
for heat-treatment and further processing and was not destined for raw
consumption.
The medium bacterial count was x = 7,3 x 104 per milliliter with a central 50
%-range from 2,6 x 104 to 2,3 x 105 colony forming units per milliliter
(cfu/ml). The colony count of 241 raw milk samples (= 58,1 %) was below
100.000 cfu/ml. Before the the EC-directive 92/46/EWG/EEC came into force on
January 1st 1994, 242 samples (= 58,3 % out of the 415 samples) and after that
date 173 raw milk samples (= 41,7 %) had been investigated. The medium
bacterial count (x) dropped from 77.000 to 64.000 cfu/ml after that date and
the percentage of samples showing colony counts less than 100.000 cfu/ml had
risen from 55,4 % to 61,9 %.
In the 374 samples tested for coliforms the medium bacterial count (x) of
these bacteria was 9,3 x 102 cfu/ml with a central 50 %-range from 2,3 x 102
to 7,5 x 103 cfu/ml.
Listeria was isolated from 44 out of 415 tested samples (= 10,6 %). 23 strains
were confirmed as Listeria monocytogenes (= 5,5 %) and 21 as Listeria innocua
(= 5,1 %). The 44 positive samples were isolated from milk samples of 28 dairy
farms (= 34,1 %) with 14 farms (= 50,0 %) showing evidence of Listeria
monocytogenes and 13 farms (= 46,4 %) Listeria innocua. In one farm both
strains were observed. The average count of Listeria in 40 samples out of the
44 positive samples was less than 102 per milliliter raw milk. Listeria-levels
of 102, 2 x 102 and twice 5,5 x 102 bacteria per milliliter raw milk were
found in the remaining four samples.
Salmonella could not be detected in 1 ml of 415 raw milk samples nor in 25 ml
of 113 parallel investigations of raw milk samples.
Nor could Campylobacter be found in any milk sample.
The growth of coagulase-positive Staphylococci was observed in 349 out of 403
(= 86,6 %) tested samples so that this microorganism occurred in 78 out of 82
farms (= 95,1 %) under investigation with a maximum of 1,5 x 106 cfu/ml. The
average count was x = 1,7 x 103 cfu/ml with a central 50 %-range from 630 -
4.400 cfu/ml.
Due to the findings the milk of some of the tested farms would cause a risk
for human health if consumed uncontrolled especially when a possible infection
with Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aures is taken into
consideration. If raw milk is heat-treated according to the Milchverordnung
(Milk Article, 1995) there is no risk of infection with pathogens.
Nevertheless, there will always remain a small risk due to technical faults
which can never be excluded.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject
staphylococcus
dc.subject
Listeria monocytogenes
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::630 Landwirtschaft::630 Landwirtschaft und verwandte Bereiche
dc.title
Untersuchungen zum Vorkommen von Listerien, Salmonellen, Campylobacter und
Staphylokokken in Rohmilch im Land Brandenburg
dc.contributor.firstReferee
Prof. Dr. G. Hildebrandt
dc.contributor.furtherReferee
Prof. Dr. W. Heeschen
dc.date.accepted
1996-12-13
dc.date.embargoEnd
2001-02-05
dc.identifier.urn
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-1998000869
dc.title.translated
Investigation on the presence of Listeria, Salmonella, Campylobacter and
Staphylococci species in raw milk colected in Brandenburg
en
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDISS_thesis_000000000041
refubium.mycore.transfer
http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/1998/86/
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDISS_derivate_000000000041
dcterms.accessRights.dnb
free
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access