dc.contributor.author
Terhorst-Molawi, Dorothea
dc.contributor.author
Fox, Lena
dc.contributor.author
Siebenhaar, Frank
dc.contributor.author
Metz, Martin
dc.contributor.author
Maurer, Marcus
dc.date.accessioned
2025-11-17T14:47:45Z
dc.date.available
2025-11-17T14:47:45Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/50400
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-50126
dc.description.abstract
In chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), wheals, angioedema, or both appear spontaneously for > 6 weeks. Current recommended treatment options for urticaria target mast cell mediators such as histamine, or activators, such as autoantibodies. The goal of CSU treatment is to treat the disease until it is gone as effectively and safely as possible. As no cure is available for CSU as of now, the treatment is aimed at continuously suppressing disease activity, with complete control of the disease and a normalization of quality of life. To achieve this, pharmacological treatment should be continued until no longer needed. Treatment of CSU should follow the basic principles of treating as much as needed and as little as possible taking into consideration that the activity of the disease may vary. Since CSU is a disease with spontaneous remission, it is hard to tell, in patients with complete control and no signs or symptoms, when medication is no longer needed. The current international guideline for urticaria suggests that the treatment can be stepped down once a patient is free of signs and symptoms. Other reasons for stepping down the treatment of CSU patients include safety concerns or issues, pregnancy or wanting to become pregnant, and economic factors. As of now, it is unclear over which period, with what intervals and with which dosages CSU treatment should be stepped down. Guidance on this is needed for all recommended therapies: (i) standard-dosed second-generation H1-antihistamine (sgAH), (ii) higher than standard-dosed sgAH, (iii) standard-dosed omalizumab, (iv) higher than standard-dosed omalizumab, and (v) cyclosporine. However, there is a lack of controlled trials on the step down and discontinuation of these treatments. Here, we aim to provide a summary of what is known and what needs to be investigated in further studies, based on our own experience and real-world evidence.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject
chronic disease
en
dc.subject
anti-allergic agents
en
dc.subject
rheumatology
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Stepping Down Treatment in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: What We Know and What We Don’t Know
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s40257-023-00761-z
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
397
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
404
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
24
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
36810982
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1175-0561
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1179-1888