dc.contributor.author
Partzsch, Lena
dc.date.accessioned
2025-11-03T08:52:39Z
dc.date.available
2025-11-03T08:52:39Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/50109
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-49834
dc.description.abstract
Environmental crisis narratives are used to justify the exercise of power, including against democratic state authority. In the cases of Danone in Volvic, France, and Tesla in Grünheide, Germany, activists are challenging the official state approval of multinationals’ exploitation of local resources amid declining water levels. This article compares the narratives that activists use in their campaigns regarding power and democracy. There are differences in the perception of the state and its potential. The Volvic water crisis in France is attributed to the state’s lethargy. In contrast, the Grünheide protest in eastern Germany is about more fundamental asymmetries. Activists reject the power of a global investor at the expense of the local institutions. This protest is about more than just protecting local water sources.
en
dc.format.extent
9 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.title
A threat to democracy? Water protests in France and Germany
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
104229
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104229
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Environmental Science & Policy
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
173
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104229
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft

refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1873-6416
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert