dc.contributor.author
Naumann, M.
dc.contributor.author
Adali, U.
dc.contributor.author
Rosentritt, M.
dc.contributor.author
Happe, A.
dc.contributor.author
Frankenberger, R.
dc.contributor.author
Sterzenbach, G.
dc.date.accessioned
2025-10-30T12:40:45Z
dc.date.available
2025-10-30T12:40:45Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/50089
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-49814
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the load-to-fracture of procedures changing crown-to-root ratio (R-CRR) aimed to restore severely damaged upper central incisors to avoid tooth extraction compared to implant placement. There is no evidence on load capability after apical root resection (AR), orthodontic extrusion (OE), and surgical crown lengthening (SCL) in respect to R-CRR, respectively.Material and methods: Human maxillary central incisors were endodontically treated, decoronated, and divided into 4 groups (n = 48). The following specimen preparation was performed: (I) adhesive core-and-post build-up (control), (II) as (I) and 2 mm apical root resection (AR), (III) before adhesive core-and-post build-up teeth were shortened 2 mm coronally (OE) (IV) as (I), but specimens were embedded 4 mm instead of 2 mm below the CEJ (SCL), group (V) implant-borne restoration with individual all-ceramic abutments (n = 12; null 4.1/l = 12 mm) (IBR). All specimens received all-ceramic crowns, thermo-mechanical (TML), and subsequent linear loading (LL) until failure. R-CRR were calculated and log-rank, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, ANOVA, and chi-square tests applied (p = 0.05).Results: Fracture loads after subsequent LL differed significantly (p = 0.001) between groups, while implants showed the highest values. F-max median (min/max) were as follows: (I) 252 (204/542), (II) 293 (243/443), (III) 253 (183/371), (IV) 195 (140/274), and (V) 446 (370/539). Pair-wise comparison showed significant differences (p = 0.001) between group I/IV and group V, I, and IV (p = 0.045), II and IV (p = 0.001), and III compared to IV (p = 0.033), respectively. R-CRR below 1 significantly increased load capability compared to R-CRR = 1.Conclusions: OE appears to preferably ensure biomechanical stability of teeth that are endodontically treated and receive core-and-post and crown placement compared to SCL. AR has no adverse biomechanical impact. R-CRR < 1 is biomechanically beneficial.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
dental caries
en
dc.subject
dental cements
en
dc.subject
dental restoration failure
en
dc.subject
dental restoration
en
dc.subject
resin cements
en
dc.subject
nonvital tooth
en
dc.subject
nonvital teeth
en
dc.subject
endodontically treated teeth
en
dc.subject
endodontically treated tooth
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Effect of apical root resection, orthodontic extrusion, and surgical crown lengthening on load capability
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00784-023-05057-4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Clinical Oral Investigations
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
4379
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
4387
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
27
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
37162571
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1436-3771