dc.contributor.author
Keshavarz, Maryam
dc.contributor.author
Franz, Mathias
dc.contributor.author
Xie, Haicheng
dc.contributor.author
Zanchi, Caroline
dc.contributor.author
Mbedi, Susan
dc.contributor.author
Sparmann, Sarah
dc.contributor.author
Rolff, Jens
dc.date.accessioned
2025-10-06T11:51:38Z
dc.date.available
2025-10-06T11:51:38Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/49673
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-49396
dc.description.abstract
Background
In many animals, survival during infection depends on the ability to coordinate interactions between the host immune system and gut microbiota. These tripartite interactions, in turn, potentially shape pathogen virulence evolution. A key regulator of the immune system and, hence, bipartite interactions in insects is the immune deficiency (Imd) pathway, which modulates gut microbiota and pathogens by synthesizing antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) through the NF-κB transcription factor Relish. However, whether Imd-dependent AMPs mediate indirect interactions between gut microbiota and pathogens in a tripartite context remains unclear. Using RNAi-mediated knockdown of Tenebrio molitor Relish (TmRelish), we hypothesized that Imd-dependent AMPs influence indirect interaction between Providencia burhodogranariea_B (P. b_B) infection and the gut microbiota.
Results
TmRelish knockdown altered bipartite interactions by disrupting gut microbiota load and composition, increasing pathogen load, and ultimately leading to higher host mortality during infection. However, we did not find support for our tripartite hypothesis that Imd-dependent AMPs mediate indirect interactions between the gut microbiota and P. b_B infection, suggesting the involvement of alternative regulatory pathways or Imd-independent mechanisms. Nevertheless, our investigations of tripartite interactions showed a positive effect of P. b_B infection on gut microbiota load, which in turn stimulated the expression of a subset of AMPs. However, this upregulation of AMPs did not result in reduced P. b_B load. Notably, the gut microbiota did not affect pathogen load but promoted host survival during P. b_B infection, indicating a role in increasing host tolerance rather than resistance.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that while Imd-dependent AMPs may not mediate tripartite interactions in our system, microbiota-host interactions, such as microbiota-mediated immune priming and changes in microbiota load, can shape infection outcomes. These effects on infection outcomes almost certainly exert important selective pressures on the evolution of bacterial virulence.
en
dc.format.extent
18 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Host–pathogen-microbiota interactions
en
dc.subject
Gut microbiota
en
dc.subject
Imd-dependent antimicrobial peptides
en
dc.subject
Tenebrio molitor
la
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
dc.title
Immune-mediated indirect interaction between gut microbiota and bacterial pathogens
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
278
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s12915-025-02399-1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
BMC Biology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
23
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-025-02399-1
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Biologie

refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.note.author
Gefördert aus Open-Access-Mitteln der Freien Universität Berlin.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1741-7007