dc.contributor.author
Ng, Sharlyn S. T.
dc.contributor.author
Oehring, Robert
dc.contributor.author
Ramasetti, Nikitha
dc.contributor.author
Roller, Roland
dc.contributor.author
Thomas, Philippe
dc.contributor.author
Chen, Yuxuan
dc.contributor.author
Moosburner, Simon
dc.contributor.author
Winter, Axel
dc.contributor.author
Maurer, Max-Magnus
dc.contributor.author
Auer, Timo A.
dc.contributor.author
Kamali, Can
dc.contributor.author
Pratschke, Johann
dc.contributor.author
Benzing, Christian
dc.contributor.author
Krenzien, Felix
dc.date.accessioned
2025-09-16T11:56:51Z
dc.date.available
2025-09-16T11:56:51Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/49320
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-49042
dc.description.abstract
Introduction Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs), also known as tumor conferences, are a cornerstone of cancer treatments. However, barriers such as incomplete patient information or logistical challenges can postpone tumor board decisions and delay patient treatment, potentially affecting clinical outcomes. Therapeutic Assistance and Decision algorithms for hepatobiliary tumor Boards (ADBoard) aims to reduce this delay by providing automated data extraction and high-quality, evidence-based treatment recommendations.Methods and analysisWith the help of natural language processing, relevant patient information will be automatically extracted from electronic medical records and used to complete a classic tumor conference protocol. A machine learning model is trained on retrospective MDM data and clinical guidelines to recommend treatment options for patients in our inclusion criteria. Study participants will be randomized to either MDM with ADBoard (Arm A: MDM-AB) or conventional MDM (Arm B: MDM-C). The concordance of recommendations of both groups will be compared using interrater reliability. We hypothesize that the therapy recommendations of ADBoard would be in high agreement with those of the MDM-C, with a Cohen's kappa value of & GE; 0.75. Furthermore, our secondary hypotheses state that the completeness of patient information presented in MDM is higher when using ADBoard than without, and the explainability of tumor board protocols in MDM-AB is higher compared to MDM-C as measured by the System Causability Scale.DiscussionThe implementation of ADBoard aims to improve the quality and completeness of the data required for MDM decision-making and to propose therapeutic recommendations that consider current medical evidence and guidelines in a transparent and reproducible manner.Ethics and disseminationThe project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin.Registration detailsThe study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (trial identifying number: NCT05681949; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05681949) on 12 January 2023.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Decision support systems, Clinical
en
dc.subject
Multidisciplinary team meeting
en
dc.subject
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
en
dc.subject
Cholangiocarcinoma
en
dc.subject
Artificial intelligence
en
dc.subject
Machine learning
en
dc.subject
Natural language processing
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
577
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s13063-023-07610-8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Trials
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
24
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
37684688
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1745-6215