dc.contributor.author
Nielsen, Martin K.
dc.contributor.author
Pyatt, Alison
dc.contributor.author
Perrett, Jodie
dc.contributor.author
Tydén, Eva
dc.contributor.author
Doorn, Deborah van
dc.contributor.author
Pihl, Tina H.
dc.contributor.author
Schmidt, Jennifer S.
dc.contributor.author
Samson-Himmelstjerna, Georg von
dc.contributor.author
Beasley, Anne
dc.contributor.author
Abbas, Ghazanfar
dc.contributor.author
Jabbar, Abdul
dc.date.accessioned
2025-08-28T06:50:58Z
dc.date.available
2025-08-28T06:50:58Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/48903
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-48626
dc.description.abstract
Equine parasite control has historically been characterized by confusing and conflicting information, posing significant challenges for veterinarians and horse owners to make evidence-based decisions. Since 2012, equine parasite control guidelines have been developed and published for different parts of the world to address this situation and provide trusted sources of current guidance. At the 2024 International Equine Infectious Disease Conference in Deauville, Normandy, France, lead authors of equine parasite control guideline documents published in the USA, UK, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, Australia, and Europe convened and presented their guidelines. This led to a discussion of differences and similarities between the guidelines and an effort to identify current research needs in this area. In general, all guidelines recommend a surveillance-based approach for equine parasite control, emphasizing the importance of anthelmintic resistance testing. Some guidelines have a focus on controlling Strongylus vulgaris, while others primarily focus on cyathostomins, ascarids and tapeworms. Although the same four anthelmintic drug classes are marketed in most countries, there are some differences between product portfolios available, most notably between Australia and other countries. European countries have various degrees of prescription-only restrictions on anthelmintic products, whereas products are available over the counter in Australia and the USA. Commercially available diagnostic portfolios differed somewhat between countries and affected recommendations made as well. In conclusion, the guidelines are in general agreement and are based on the same general principles. One major challenge is communicating the recommendations effectively to end-users, which should be made a priority going forward.
en
dc.format.extent
8 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
Drug resistance
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::630 Landwirtschaft::630 Landwirtschaft und verwandte Bereiche
dc.title
Global equine parasite control guidelines: Consensus or confusion?
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
100600
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1016/j.ijpddr.2025.100600
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
28
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2025.100600
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Parasitologie und Tropenveterinärmedizin

refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2211-3207
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert