dc.contributor.author
Huber, Jakob
dc.date.accessioned
2025-04-09T07:42:26Z
dc.date.available
2025-04-09T07:42:26Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/47239
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-46957
dc.description.abstract
In responding to the stimulating commentaries by Alice Pinheiro Walla, Anna Stilz and Elisabeth Ellis, I aim to clarify and stimulate further engagement with some of the main arguments in ‘Kant’s Grounded Cosmopolitanism’. In particular, I highlight two premises that are seminal to Kant’s systematic framework of political morality as I reconstruct it: the radically relational and political nature of rights. While the commentators articulate various lines of critique, many of their queries can be understood as targeting (one or both of) these tenets on exegetical and/or systematic grounds.
en
dc.format.extent
12 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
cosmopolitanism
en
dc.subject
global justice
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::100 Philosophie::102 Verschiedenes
dc.title
Justice for earth dwellers: a reply to my critics
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1080/16544951.2024.2438501
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Ethics & Global Politics
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
36
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
47
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
18
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2024.2438501
refubium.affiliation
Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Philosophie

refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1654-6369
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert