dc.contributor.author
Wandrey, Jan D.
dc.contributor.author
Behnel, Niklas
dc.contributor.author
Weidner, Elisa
dc.contributor.author
Dummin, Ulrike
dc.contributor.author
von Dincklage, Falk
dc.contributor.author
Tafelski, Sascha
dc.date.accessioned
2025-03-24T11:50:12Z
dc.date.available
2025-03-24T11:50:12Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/46997
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-46712
dc.description.abstract
Background
Measuring pain intensity in patients unable to communicate is a challenge on general wards. Observation-based pain scoring tools have been used for patients with dementia or in critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, there is no established or validated assessment tool for non-ICU patients without dementia related cognitive deficiencies who cannot communicate. The “Behavioural Pain Scale Non-Intubated” (BPS-NI) and the “Pain Assessment In Advanced Dementia-German” (PAINAD-G) are potential tools to fill this gap.
Methods
This study was performed with verbal non-ICU patients on general wards at Charité Berlin. Two assessors independently rated pain intensity using the BPS-NI and the PAINAD-G along with patients' self-ratings on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The interrater-reliability of BPS-NI and PAINAD-G was calculated and ROC-analyses were performed to identify cut-off values for medium and intense pain for each score. Effectiveness was calculated using percentage agreement. In total, 126 patients were included into analysis.
Results
The BPS-NI showed substantial congruence in interrater-reliability (Cohens-Kappa 0.71), whereas the PAINAD-G showed moderate congruence (Kappa 0.48). Based on ROC-analyses, for medium pain levels a cut-off 4 (BPS-NI) or 2 (PAINAD-G) and for severe pain levels cut-off 5 (BPS-NI) and 3 (PAINAD-G) would result in good accordance with self-reported NRS for pain.
Conclusion
The BPS-NI shows a good validity in measuring pain intensity in patients on general wards and may possibly be used for patients unable to communicate. Using defined cut-off values for BPS-NI and PAINAD-G, clinically relevant pain intensities in patients can reliably be detected.
Significance
Measuring the pain intensity in patients unable to communicate is a common challenge on general wards. This study assessed reliability and applicability BPS-NI and the PAINAD-G in a general ward setting. Furthermore, it provides cut-off values in order to estimate pain intensity and support analgesic response.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
pain measurement
en
dc.subject
patients' rooms
en
dc.subject
reproducibility of results
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Behaviour-based pain scales: Validity and interrater reliability of BPS‐NI and PAINAD‐G on general wards
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1002/ejp.2051
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
European Journal of Pain
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Wiley
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
201
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
211
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
27
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
36326568
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1090-3801
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1532-2149