dc.contributor.author
Macher, Till-Hendrik
dc.contributor.author
Beermann, Arne J.
dc.contributor.author
Arle, Jens
dc.contributor.author
Foerster, Julia
dc.contributor.author
Greyer, Matthias
dc.contributor.author
Mora, Demetrio
dc.contributor.author
Koschorreck, Jan
dc.contributor.author
Rolauffs, Peter
dc.contributor.author
Rother, Anne
dc.contributor.author
Zimmermann, Jonas
dc.date.accessioned
2025-02-07T13:49:36Z
dc.date.available
2025-02-07T13:49:36Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/46536
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-46250
dc.description.abstract
The ecological state of aquatic ecosystems is systematically monitored using various bioindicators in many countries worldwide. In the European Union, freshwater biomonitoring is the central component of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD, 2000/60/EC) and currently based on morpho-taxonomic methods. DNA metabarcoding is a novel approach to assess the ecological state fast and efficiently based on organismal DNA signatures and thereby support and upscale biomonitoring. However, compliance of metabarcoding with existing morpho-taxonomic methods must be ensured prior to official implementation. Thus, this study, co-designed by research institutions and environmental agencies, explored necessary key parameters and performed method intercalibration for the implementation of metabarcoding into WFD assessments of running waters. We focussed on benthic invertebrates as the most commonly used bioindicators. We analysed 170 invertebrate samples collected as part of the German federal state WFD routine stream biomonitoring, first via microscopic determination and then using metabarcoding. Our goals were to quantify overlap in i) taxonomic composition and ii) ecological status derived with both methods. For this purpose, we established data harmonisation measures to integrate invertebrate metabarcoding data into the official national WFD classification modules considering abundance and presence/absence data. Our results revealed a high (ca. 70 %) overlap of bioindicator taxa found with both methods. Metabarcoding identified significantly more small invertebrate taxa and detected similar proportions of the important bioindicator ‘EPT’ taxa (mayflies, stoneflies, caddisflies). Despite deviations in some detected bioindicator taxa, the derived ecological status classes were highly correlated between methods, particularly after intercalibration (R2 = 0.74, Spearman rho = 0.86). Regardless of whether we used abundance or presence/absence data, the resulting stream type classifications showed strong agreement. Thus, our study not only demonstrates the consistency of the methods for the stream types analysed but is also the first to operationalise a path to integration of metabarcoding data into the WFD assessment modules based on formal intercalibration guidelines.
en
dc.format.extent
11 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Bioassessment
en
dc.subject
Biomonitoring
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
dc.title
Fit for purpose? Evaluating benthic invertebrate DNA metabarcoding for ecological status class assessment in streams under the Water Framework Directive
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
122987
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1016/j.watres.2024.122987
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Water Research
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
272
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122987
refubium.affiliation
Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem (BGBM)
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1879-2448
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert