dc.contributor.author
Festbaum, Christian
dc.contributor.author
Minkus, Marvin
dc.contributor.author
Akgün, Doruk
dc.contributor.author
Hupperich, Andreas
dc.contributor.author
Maier, Dirk
dc.contributor.author
Auffarth, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Mitterer, Marian
dc.contributor.author
Hoffelner, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Tauber, Mark
dc.contributor.author
Fritsch, Lorenz
dc.contributor.author
Moroder, Philipp
dc.date.accessioned
2024-10-02T15:03:00Z
dc.date.available
2024-10-02T15:03:00Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/45128
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-44840
dc.description.abstract
Purpose: Purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid- to long-term outcome after conservatively treated first-time posterior shoulder dislocations and to determine structural defects associated with failure.
Methods: In this multi-centric retrospective study, 29 shoulders in 28 patients with first-time acute posterior shoulder dislocation (Type A1 or A2 according to the ABC classification) and available cross-sectional imaging were included. Outcome scores as well as radiological and magnetic resonance imaging were obtained at a mean follow-up of 8.3 +/- 2.7 years (minimum: 5 years). The association of structural defects with redislocation, need for secondary surgery, and inferior clinical outcomes were analysed.
Results: Redislocation occurred in six (21%) shoulders and nine shoulders (31%) underwent secondary surgery due to persistent symptoms. The posttraumatic posterior glenohumeral subluxation was higher in the redislocation group compared to the no redislocation group; however, statistical significance was not reached (61.9 +/- 12.5% vs. 50.6 +/- 6.4%). Furthermore, a higher adapted gamma angle was observed in the failed conservative treatment group versus the conservative treatment group, similarly without statistically significant difference (97.8 degrees +/- 7.2 degrees, vs. 93.3 degrees +/- 9.7 degrees). The adapted gamma angle was higher than 90 degrees in all patients of failed conservative therapy and the redislocation group. An older age at the time of dislocation showed a significant correlation with better clinical outcomes (SSV: r = 0.543, p = 0.02; ROWE: r = 0.418, p = 0.035 and WOSI: r = 0.478, p = 0.045). Posterior glenohumeral subluxation after trauma correlated with a worse WOSI (r = - 0.59, p = 0.02) and follow-up posterior glenohumeral decentring (r = 0.68, p = 0.007). The gamma angle (r = 0.396, p = 0.039) and depth of the reverse Hill-Sachs lesion (r = 0.437, p = 0.023) correlated significantly with the grade of osteoarthritis at follow-up.
Conclusion: Conservative treatment is a viable option in patients with an acute traumatic posterior shoulder dislocation with good outcome after mid- and long-term follow-up especially in patients with centred joint, low gamma angle, and middle or old age.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Posterior shoulder instability
en
dc.subject
Shoulder dislocation
en
dc.subject
Reverse Hill-Sachs lesion
en
dc.subject
Conservative therapy
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Conservative treatment of acute traumatic posterior shoulder dislocations (Type A) is a viable option especially in patients with centred joint, low gamma angle, and middle or old age
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00167-022-06883-x
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
7
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
2500
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
2509
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
30
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
35092444
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0942-2056
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1433-7347